Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
Date Submitted: Jan 6, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 28, 2021 - Feb 22, 2022
Date Accepted: Aug 2, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Effectiveness and feasibility of real-time telerehabilitation for elderly people with musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review
ABSTRACT
Background:
Effectiveness of real-time telerehabilitation (RTTR) were evaluated in this systematic review on physical performance, adherence, and cost-effectiveness among elderly people with musculoskeletal condition.
Objective:
A systematic electronic literature search was conducted in Cochrane, PubMed/MEDLINE and PEDro according to PRISMA guidelines.
Methods:
Systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted in the area that involved elderly people with musculoskeletal conditions and any physical performance indexes were included. video conference and phone call were kind of RTTR was defined as a specific remote rehabilitation intervention to allowing healthcare professional/patient interaction. Information regarding the effect and feasibility (intervention completion rate) of RTTR was extracted from eligible articles. This study is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42021287289
Results:
Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used for revised randomized trials to assess methodological quality of the included articles. Eventually, seven studies were included as eligible articles. The overall risk of bias judgment was assessed as “High” in one studies. All studies were conducted in either South Korea, Canada, Italy, the USA, or Australia, and heterogeneity in terms of participants’ health condition and intervention regimen was observed across the studies. Our narrative-based analysis were reported across the seven studies showed that compared with conventional rehabilitation, either equal or better effects on physical performance. The intervention completion rates were 87%± 9 on average (range 67–97%).
Conclusions:
Although our studies were limited relevant information with heterogeneity make obtain we could not conclusive evidence, our findings suggest that RTTR can be a strategy for rehabilitation service delivery with acceptable feasibility comparable to conventional rehabilitation for elderly people with musculoskeletal. Clinical Trial: the PROSPERO registration number CRD42021287289; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.