Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging
Date Submitted: Dec 22, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 22, 2021 - Feb 16, 2022
Date Accepted: Mar 14, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Who is Included in Digital Health Technologies to Support Hospital to Home Transitions for Older Adults?: Secondary analysis of a rapid review and equity-informed recommendations
ABSTRACT
Background:
Digital health technologies have been proposed to support hospital to home transitions for older adults. The COVID-19 pandemic and associated physical distancing guidelines propelled a shift to digital health technologies. However, the characteristics of older adults who participated in digital health interventions to support hospital to home transitions remain unclear. This information is needed to assess whether current digital health technologies are generalizable to the needs of broader older adult populations.
Objective:
We conducted a rapid review of the existing literature to: i) identify the characteristics of the populations targeted by studies testing the implementation of digital health interventions that are designed to support hospital to home transitions, ii) identify the characteristics of the samples included within studies testing digital health interventions used to support hospital to home transitions, and iii) create recommendations for enhancing the diversity of samples within future digital health interventions.
Methods:
A rapid review methodology informed by Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) scoping review guidelines was conducted. A search for peer-reviewed literature published between (2010-2021) on digital health solutions that support hospital to home transitions for older adults was conducted through MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. The Sex-and Gender-Based Analysis Plus (SGBA+) lens theoretically guided the study design, analysis and interpretation.
Results:
34 papers met inclusion criteria. Our findings indicate that many groups of older adults were excluded from these interventions and remain understudied. Specifically, the “oldest old” and those living with cognitive impairments were excluded from studies included in this review. In addition, very few studies described characteristics related to gender diversity, education, race, ethnicity and culture. No study commented on the sexual orientation of participants.
Conclusions:
This is the first review, to our knowledge, that has mapped the literature focusing on the inclusion of older adults in digital hospital to home interventions. Findings suggest that the literature on digital health interventions tends to operationalize older adults as a homogenous group, ignoring the heterogeneity in older age definitions. Inconsistency in the literature surrounding the characteristics of included participants suggests a need for further study to understand better how digital technologies to support hospital to home transitions can be inclusive. Clinical Trial: N/A
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.