Previously submitted to: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (no longer under consideration since Mar 07, 2023)
Date Submitted: Dec 28, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 21, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Social Media–Detected Early Disaster Events: An E-Warning System of Emergency Medical Operation Centers Deployed in Taiwan
ABSTRACT
Background:
Because messages are broadcast on social media timelessly and efficiently, it is a critical disaster management survey tool. Taiwan’s Regional Emergency Medical Operation Center (REMOC), supervised by the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Taiwan (MOHW), has responded to nationwide disaster messages in real time since 2005.
Objective:
To construct an early warning system to reduce the time delay between the outbreak of accidents and messages received by REMOC.
Methods:
We developed a program to harvest online messages from numerous social media platforms. Messages containing disaster-relevant keywords, such as typhoon, flooding, and traffic accidents, were scrutinized. We applied text analytics methods and an open-source classification tool LibShortText, a support vector machine (SVM) approach, to identify disaster-related messages. REMOC’s on-duty staff used this information system to harvest disaster-related messages and cases between January 2019 and December 2019. The frequency of events and the percentage of the number of messages that were posted faster than the number of messages that were shared were calculated according to the messages shared by traditional media or posted by individual social media users. The engagement rate (ER) was applied to infer the response rate of registered messages by either traditional media or social media users.
Results:
The system filtered 3022 disaster-related messages from 66 588 total messages. The majority of the messages were related to earthquakes (23%), followed by traffic accidents (17%), fires (12%), and floods (3%). A total of 702 messages were related to 142 earthquake episodes. Of them, 35 messages were shared by social media users regarding 18 earthquakes, and 667 messages from traditional media concerned 124 earthquakes. Social media users posted 100% of the messages faster than traditional media reported them (the “early dissemination efficacy” by social media; 124/124). A total of 367 messages regarded 251 fires; social media users shared 122 messages regarding 82 fires, and traditional media posted 245 messages about 169 fires. The early dissemination efficacy of social media for fires was 0.57 hours. A total of 117 messages from 32 floods were harvested, 55 messages about 16 floods were shared by social media users, and 62 messages for 16 floods were posted by traditional media users; the early dissemination efficacy of social media regarding floods was 0.65 hours.
Conclusions:
Our results indicate that social media users responded to disaster news faster than did traditional media, especially regarding earthquakes, fires, and floods. Of all disasters, earthquakes and floods had the greatest response rate from social media users. The combined usage of REMOCs and social media crawler system could considerably improve the preparation for and the response to natural disasters, particularly earthquakes and floods.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.