Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Dec 20, 2021
Date Accepted: Aug 17, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Use of an Online Forum for Relatives of People With Psychosis and Bipolar Disorder: Mixed Methods Study

Jones S, Atanasova D, Dodd S, Flowers S, Rosala-Hallas A, Robinson H, Semino E, Lobban F

Use of an Online Forum for Relatives of People With Psychosis and Bipolar Disorder: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Ment Health 2022;9(10):e35837

DOI: 10.2196/35837

PMID: 36264621

PMCID: 9634518

Use of an online forum for relatives of people with psychosis and bipolar disorder: a multi-method study

  • Steven Jones; 
  • Dimitrinka Atanasova; 
  • Susanna Dodd; 
  • Susan Flowers; 
  • Anna Rosala-Hallas; 
  • Heather Robinson; 
  • Elena Semino; 
  • Fiona Lobban

ABSTRACT

Background:

Relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder experience high levels of distress but typically are not offered the support they need. Peer online forums may offer a solution, but knowledge about who uses them, how and why is limited. The current study reported on online forum usage during the REACT trial [21].

Objective:

We aimed to report: (1) who used the forum and why; (2) how sociodemographic factors are associated with participation; (3) the relationships between frequency, type of use, and outcomes; and (4) how the forum was used.

Methods:

Relationships between key socio-demographic characteristics, levels of forum use, and distress were statistically analysed. We used thematic and semantic analysis to understand the reasons relatives joined the forum and the key topics initiated by them. We also used the UCREL Semantic Analysis System (USAS) to compare how relatives and REACT Supporters (moderators) used the forum.

Results:

348 participants from REACT had complete web-usage data and were included in this study. The forum was accessed by 59% of relatives across the whole age range with no significant associations between sociodemographic factors and forum participation, or between level/type of use and relatives’ distress levels. Relatives joined the forum primarily to find people in similar circumstances, express concerns and talk about stressful events. Relatives were concerned most about recent events, negative emotions linked to caring, experiences of conflict/threat, and concerns about suicide. These posts underscored both the challenges relatives were facing and that they felt safe to share these in this context.

Conclusions:

Whilst only a proportion of REACT participants engaged actively with its forum they are widely distributed across age and other sociodemographic groupings. Relatives used the forum for information, support and guidance and to offer detailed information about their experiences. The topics raised highlight the burden carried by relatives and the potential value of easy access, moderated, peer supported forums in helping relatives manage the challenges they face.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jones S, Atanasova D, Dodd S, Flowers S, Rosala-Hallas A, Robinson H, Semino E, Lobban F

Use of an Online Forum for Relatives of People With Psychosis and Bipolar Disorder: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Ment Health 2022;9(10):e35837

DOI: 10.2196/35837

PMID: 36264621

PMCID: 9634518

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.