Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Dec 14, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 14, 2021 - Feb 8, 2022
Date Accepted: Apr 6, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

A Model for Estimating Biological Age From Physiological Biomarkers of Healthy Aging: Cross-sectional Study

Husted KLS, Brink-Kjær A, Fogelstrøm M, Hulst P, Bleibach A, Henneberg KÃ, Sorensen HBD, Dela F, Jacobsen JCB, Helge JW

A Model for Estimating Biological Age From Physiological Biomarkers of Healthy Aging: Cross-sectional Study

JMIR Aging 2022;5(2):e35696

DOI: 10.2196/35696

PMID: 35536617

PMCID: 9131142

The proposition of a model estimating biological age from physiological biomarkers of healthy aging: a cross-sectional study

  • Karina Louise Skov Husted; 
  • Andreas Brink-Kjær; 
  • Mathilde Fogelstrøm; 
  • Pernille Hulst; 
  • Akita Bleibach; 
  • Kaj-Ã…ge Henneberg; 
  • Helge Bjarup Dissing Sorensen; 
  • Flemming Dela; 
  • Jens Christian Brings Jacobsen; 
  • Jørn Wulff Helge

ABSTRACT

Background:

Individual differences in rate of aging and susceptibility to disease are not accounted for by chronological age alone. These individual differences are better explained by biological age, which may be estimated by biomarker prediction models. In the light of the aging demographics of the global population and the increase in lifestyle related morbidities, it is interesting to invent a new biological age model to be used for health promotion.

Objective:

To develop a model that estimate biological age based on physiological biomarkers of healthy aging.

Methods:

Carefully selected physiological variables from a healthy study population of 100 women and men were used as biomarkers to establish an estimate of biological age. Principal component analysis was applied to the biomarkers and the first principal component was used to define the algorithm estimating biological age.

Results:

The first principal component accounted for 31% in women and 25% in men of the total variance in the biological age model combining: mean arterial pressure, glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c), waist circumference, Forced Expiratory Volume within the first sec. (FEV1), maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), adiponectin, High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), total cholesterol and Soluble urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR). The correlation between the corrected biological age and chronological age was r=0.86 (p<.0001) and r=0.81 (p<.0001) for women and men, respectively and the agreement was high and unbiased. No difference was found between mean chronological age and mean biological age, and the slope of the regression line was near one for both sexes.

Conclusions:

Estimating biological age from these nine biomarkers of aging can be used to assess general health compared to the healthy aging trajectory. This may be useful to evaluate health interventions and as an aid to enhance awareness of individual health risks and behavior, when deviating from this trajectory. Clinical Trial: Trial Registration: Clinical Trial number: NCT03680768; Regional Ethics Committee, Denmark (H-18031350)


 Citation

Please cite as:

Husted KLS, Brink-Kjær A, Fogelstrøm M, Hulst P, Bleibach A, Henneberg KÃ, Sorensen HBD, Dela F, Jacobsen JCB, Helge JW

A Model for Estimating Biological Age From Physiological Biomarkers of Healthy Aging: Cross-sectional Study

JMIR Aging 2022;5(2):e35696

DOI: 10.2196/35696

PMID: 35536617

PMCID: 9131142

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.