Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Mental Health (no longer under consideration since Nov 28, 2021)

Date Submitted: Nov 26, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 26, 2021 - Nov 28, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Telehealth May Reduce Rural-Urban Disparities in Accessing Pediatric Psychiatry Services: A Case Study of Trends in Central Ohio from 2020 to 2021

  • Ujjwal Ramtekkar; 
  • Jin Peng; 
  • Yungui Huang; 
  • Simon Linwood

ABSTRACT

Background:

The rural-urban disparities in access to child behavioral health services are well known and are further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic related restrictions on travel and in person visits. Fortunately, regulatory flexibilities allowed rapid transition of telehealth to reduce contagion while maintaining continuity of care. However, there has been contradicting evidence on whether telehealth narrows the rural-urban gap.

Objective:

To examine the telehealth utilization trends and no-show rates between urban vs rural areas for pediatric psychiatry visits after the public health emergency was declared.

Methods:

Using 2020-2021 electronic health records (EHR) data from the psychiatry department at a large urban academic pediatric hospital, we calculated the telemedicine utilization rates by patient’s residence area (urban vs rural). We used two proportions z-tests to examine whether the observed differences in no-show rates among 4 types of visit (urban office visit, urban telemedicine visit, rural office visit, and rural telemedicine visit) were statistically significant.

Results:

Telemedicine utilization rates (~80%) are comparable in urban and rural areas. The average no-show rates for telemedicine visits were around 17% for both urban and rural patients, while the average no-show rates for office visits were around 20% for urban patients and fluctuated between 15% and 36% for rural patients. Two proportions z-tests indicated that, for rural patients, telemedicine visits had significantly lower no-show rates than office visits between Sept 2020 and Feb 2021, but such difference turned insignificant after March 2021.

Conclusions:

Telehealth improved access to child psychiatric services for rural families when primary delivery of services was telehealth-based. Returning to in-person only options and limiting telehealth access would be detrimental to behavioral health outcomes of rural children that have been traditionally underserved. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ramtekkar U, Peng J, Huang Y, Linwood S

Telehealth May Reduce Rural-Urban Disparities in Accessing Pediatric Psychiatry Services: A Case Study of Trends in Central Ohio from 2020 to 2021

JMIR Preprints. 26/11/2021:35231

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.35231

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/35231

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.