Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Nov 24, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 24, 2021 - Jan 19, 2022
Date Accepted: Feb 19, 2022
Date Submitted to PubMed: Apr 18, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Accuracy of wearable transdermal alcohol sensors: A systematic review
ABSTRACT
Background:
There are a range of wearable transdermal alcohol sensors (TAS) available and currently being developed. These devices have the potential to be able to monitor alcohol consumption continuously, over extended time periods in an objective manner, overcoming some of the limitations of other alcohol measurement methods (blood, breath and urine).
Objective:
This systematic review aims to assess their accuracy.
Methods:
A systematic search was conducted of the CINAHL, EMBASE, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed and Scopus bibliographic databases in February 2021. Two members of the study team independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Each study methodological quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The primary outcome was TAS accuracy. The data is presented as a narrative synthesis.
Results:
We identified and analysed 32 studies. Study designs included: laboratory and ambulatory, mixed and RCTs and the length the device was worn ranged from days to weeks. Five studies included used more than one brand of TAS. Results for transdermal alcohol concentration data from various TAS were generally found to be positively correlated with BrAC, BAC and self-report. The WrisTAS and BACtrack prototype reported higher malfunctions and noise within data files compared to SCRAM however these devices also report a reduced time lag for transdermal alcohol concentration values than SCRAM. It was also found that many companies were developing new models of TAS devices.
Conclusions:
There is a lack of research investigating the accuracy of TAS as a tool to monitor alcohol consumption within clinical populations and use over extended periods of time. While there is some preliminary evidence suggesting the accuracy of these devices this needs to be further investigated with clinical populations. Clinical Trial: Systematic review registration: CRD42021231027
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.