Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Nov 23, 2021
Date Accepted: Dec 31, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluation of a Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool (myfood24) in Norwegian Women and Men Aged 60-74 Years: Usability Study

Hopstock LA, Medin AC, Skeie G, Henriksen A, Lundblad MW

Evaluation of a Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool (myfood24) in Norwegian Women and Men Aged 60-74 Years: Usability Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(3):e35092

DOI: 10.2196/35092

PMID: 35275079

PMCID: 8956983

Evaluation of a web-based dietary assessment tool (myfood24®): A usability study in Norwegian women and men aged 60-74 years

  • Laila Arnesdatter Hopstock; 
  • Anine Christine Medin; 
  • Guri Skeie; 
  • André Henriksen; 
  • Marie Wasmuth Lundblad

ABSTRACT

Background:

A healthy diet throughout the life-course improve health and reduce the risk of disease. There is a need for new knowledge of the relation between diet and health, but existing methods to collect information on food and nutrient intake have their limitations. Evaluations of new tools to assess dietary intake is needed, especially in old people, where the introduction of new technology might impose challenges.

Objective:

We aimed to examine the usability of a new web-based dietary assessment tool in older adult women and men.

Methods:

A total of 60 women and men (participation 83%, 57% women) aged 60-74 years recruited by convenience- and snowball sampling completed a 24-hour online dietary recall using the newly developed Norwegian version of myfood24®. Total energy- and nutrient intakes were calculated in myfood24®, primarily based on the Norwegian Food Composition Table. No guidance or support were given to complete the recall. Usability was assessed by the system usability scale (SUS) questionnaire, where a SUS score ≥68 is considered satisfactory. We examined the response to SUS single items and mean SUS score with standard deviations (SD) in groups of sex, age, educational level and device used to complete the recall (smartphone, tablet, or computer).

Results:

Mean total energy intake was 5815 (SD 3093) kilojoules. A total of 14% had an energy intake <2100 kilojoules (i.e., 500 kilocalories), and none >16800 kilojoules (i.e., 4000 kilocalories), respectively. Mean energy percentages from carbohydrates, fat, protein, alcohol and fibre were within the national recommendations. Mean SUS was 55.5 (SD 18.6), and 27% had SUS scores above the satisfactory product cut-off. Higher SUS scores were associated with younger age and lower education, but not with the type of device used.

Conclusions:

We found the overall usability of a new web-based dietary assessment tool to be below satisfactory according to standard usability criteria in a sample of 60-74 year-old Norwegians. The observed total energy intakes suggest that several of the participants underreported their intake during the completion of the dietary recall. Implementing online dietary assessment tools in older adults is feasible, but guidance and support might be needed to ensure valid completion.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hopstock LA, Medin AC, Skeie G, Henriksen A, Lundblad MW

Evaluation of a Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool (myfood24) in Norwegian Women and Men Aged 60-74 Years: Usability Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(3):e35092

DOI: 10.2196/35092

PMID: 35275079

PMCID: 8956983

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.