Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Dec 01, 2021)

Date Submitted: Nov 19, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 19, 2021 - Nov 24, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Methodological issues to analyse real-world longitudinal occupational health data

  • Rémi Colin Chevalier; 
  • Frédéric Dutheil; 
  • Samuel Dewavrin; 
  • Thomas Cornet; 
  • Julien S Baker; 
  • Bruno Pereira

ABSTRACT

Ever greater technological advances and democratization of digital tools such as computers and smartphones offer researchers new possibilities to collect large amounts of health data in order to conduct clinical research. Such data, called real-world data (RWD), appears to be a perfect complement to traditional randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and has become more important in health decisions. Due to its longitudinal nature, RWD is subject to well-known methodological issues that can occur when collecting this type of data. In this article, we present the three main methodological problems encountered by researchers, these include, the longitudinal data itself, missing data (not available - NA) and cluster-correlated data. These concepts have been widely discussed in the literature and many methods and solutions have been proposed to cope with these issues. As examples, mixed and trajectory models have been developed to explore longitudinal data sets, imputation methods can resolve NA issues, and multilevel models facilitate treating cluster-correlated data. This article reviews the various solutions proposed and attempts to analyze all three in detail. Although solutions exist to meet these data collection challenges, solutions are not always correctly exploited, especially in cases where data collection issues overlap. In an attempt to solve this problem, we have conceived a process that considers all three issues simultaneously. This process can be divided into two parts: the first part of data management comprises of several phases such as definition of data structure, identification of suspect data and application of imputation methods. The second part of the analysis relates to the application of different models for repeated data using the modified data set. As a result, it should be possible to facilitate work with data sets and provide results with higher confidence levels. To support our proposal, we have used results from the “Wittyfit” database, which is an epidemiological database of occupational health data.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Colin Chevalier R, Dutheil F, Dewavrin S, Cornet T, Baker JS, Pereira B

Methodological issues to analyse real-world longitudinal occupational health data

JMIR Preprints. 19/11/2021:35068

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.35068

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/35068

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.