Currently submitted to: JMIR Preprints
Date Submitted: Nov 2, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 2, 2021 - Oct 18, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Peer led practice improves medical student confidence in subsequent Objective Structured Clinical Examinations
ABSTRACT
Background:
Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) teaching is often inadequate leading to confusion amongst medical students and junior doctors. Active learning approaches such as simulation improves retention of learning. A peer led simulated OSCE programme improved medical students’ knowledge and confidence in recognising and managing DKA.
Objective:
To design a protocol to improve medical education on the topic of DKA.
Methods:
A combination of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and medical simulation was devised utilising a SMART simulator mannequin and a peer taking the role of simulated patient. Students received two debriefs, individual feedback and group discussion. Students were assessed through objective assessment results from a questionmark assessment.
Results:
Objective scores on assessment were improved from 5.2/10 (SD, 1.0) to 10/10 (SD, 2.1) on the questionmark. The difference in scores was statistically significant (p<0.05).
Conclusions:
Medical students benefit from and enjoy OSCE style simulation education on DKA. This programme could be expanded to other topics in acute medicine and extended to other students in healthcare professions.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.