Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Perioperative Medicine

Date Submitted: Oct 28, 2021
Date Accepted: Jun 20, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Worldwide Presence of National Anesthesia Societies on Four Major Social Networks in 2021: Observational Case Study

Clavier T, Occhiali E, Guenet C, Vannier N, Hache C, Compere V, Selim J, Besnier E

Worldwide Presence of National Anesthesia Societies on Four Major Social Networks in 2021: Observational Case Study

JMIR Perioper Med 2022;5(1):e34549

DOI: 10.2196/34549

PMID: 35857379

PMCID: 9350816

Worldwide presence of national anaesthesia societies on four major social networks in 2021: a case study

  • Thomas Clavier; 
  • Emilie Occhiali; 
  • Claire Guenet; 
  • Naurine Vannier; 
  • Camille Hache; 
  • Vincent Compere; 
  • Jean Selim; 
  • Emmanuel Besnier

ABSTRACT

Background:

Although the presence of medical societies on social networks (SNs) could be interesting for disseminating professional information, there is no study investigating their presence on SNs.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to describe the worldwide presence, visibility and activity of national anaesthesia societies on SNs.

Methods:

This observational study assessed the active presence (≥1 post in the year preceding the collection date) of World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists (WFSA) member societies on the SNs Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube. We collected data concerning each anaesthesia society on the WFSA website.

Results:

Among the 136 societies, 66 (48.5%) had an active presence on at least one SN, the most used social network was Facebook (44.1%), followed by Twitter (27.2%), YouTube (19.1%) and Instagram (11.8%). The SN with the largest number of followers was Facebook for 52 societies (78.8%) and Twitter for 12 societies (18.2%). The number of followers was 361 [75-1806] on Twitter, 2494 [1049-5369] on Facebook, 1400 [303-3058] on Instagram and 214 [33-955] on YouTube. There was a strong correlation between the number of posts and the number of followers on Twitter (r=0.95 [0.91;0.97]; P<0.0001), Instagram (r=0.83 [0.58;0.94]; P<0.0001), and YouTube (r=0.69 [0.42;0.85]; P<0.0001). There was no difference between societies with and without active SN accounts according to the density of physician anaesthesia providers in the country

Conclusions:

Less than half of national anaesthesia societies have at least one active account on SNs. Twitter and Facebook are the most commonly used SNs.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Clavier T, Occhiali E, Guenet C, Vannier N, Hache C, Compere V, Selim J, Besnier E

Worldwide Presence of National Anesthesia Societies on Four Major Social Networks in 2021: Observational Case Study

JMIR Perioper Med 2022;5(1):e34549

DOI: 10.2196/34549

PMID: 35857379

PMCID: 9350816

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.