Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Oct 25, 2021
Date Accepted: Mar 1, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

In-Person Versus Telehealth Setting for the Delivery of Substance Use Disorder Treatment: Ecologically Valid Comparison Study

Ngo Q, Braughton JE, Gliske K, Waller LA, Sitar S, Kretman DN, Cooper HL, Welsh J

In-Person Versus Telehealth Setting for the Delivery of Substance Use Disorder Treatment: Ecologically Valid Comparison Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(4):e34408

DOI: 10.2196/34408

PMID: 35377318

PMCID: 9016509

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

In-Person versus Telehealth Substance Use Treatment: An Ecologically Valid Comparison

  • Quyen Ngo; 
  • Jacqueline E. Braughton; 
  • Kate Gliske; 
  • Lance A. Waller; 
  • Siara Sitar; 
  • Danielle N. Kretman; 
  • Hannah L.F. Cooper; 
  • Justine Welsh

ABSTRACT

Background:

The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly transformed substance use disorder treatment in the United States. Use of telehealth services rapidly increased as a means to mitigate viral transmission of the disease. Emergency federal and state policies removed geographic and site-of-service restrictions and increased the number of telehealth services covered by insurers. Although telehealth has the ability to increase access to care, little is known about how the long-term treatment effectiveness of substance use disorder interventions delivered through digital technologies compares to in-person treatment. Even less is known about how patient, clinician, and clinical characteristics may predict treatment outcomes.

Objective:

To analyze treatment-related outcomes and explore patient predictors of treatment efficacy across traditional and telehealth settings in a sample of participants (n=3,642) who received intensive outpatient (IOP) substance use treatment from January 2020 to March 2021.

Methods:

The VIOP study is a prospective longitudinal cohort design that follows adult (18+ years) patients who discharged from intensive outpatient programmatic care for alcohol and substance use-related treatment at Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation (HBFF) between January 2020 and March 2021. Data were collected at six time periods: baseline (at admission), 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months post-discharge from both in-person and virtual IOP services through phone- and web-based administered surveys to assess recent substance use and general functioning across several domains.

Results:

Initial baseline descriptives were conducted on patient outcome measurements. Follow-up data collection is ongoing and expected to be completed in March of 2022.

Conclusions:

The findings aim to contribute to deepening our fields’ understanding of substance use disorder treatment efficacy across traditional and telehealth settings and its associated correlates and predictors of patient-centered outcomes. Results from this study will inform the effective development of data-driven benchmarks and protocols for routine outcomes data practices in these treatment settings. Clinical Trial: n/a


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ngo Q, Braughton JE, Gliske K, Waller LA, Sitar S, Kretman DN, Cooper HL, Welsh J

In-Person Versus Telehealth Setting for the Delivery of Substance Use Disorder Treatment: Ecologically Valid Comparison Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(4):e34408

DOI: 10.2196/34408

PMID: 35377318

PMCID: 9016509

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.