Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Oct 16, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 16, 2021 - Dec 11, 2021
Date Accepted: Jul 18, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
mHealth Physical Activity Intervention for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: Planning and Development Processes
ABSTRACT
Background:
Interventions to support physical activity participation among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) are required given this population’s low levels of physical activity and extensive barriers to quality physical activity experiences.
Objective:
The purpose of this project was to develop SCI Step Together, a mHealth intervention to improve the quantity and quality of physical activity among individuals with SCI who walk.
Methods:
Our overarching methodological framework was the Person-Based Approach. This included four steps: 1) conduct primary and secondary research, 2a) design intervention objectives and features, 2b) conduct behavioural analysis and theory, 3) create logic model, and 4) complete SCI Step Together program content and integrated knowledge translation (IKT), which occurred throughout development. Informed by the SCI IKT Guiding Principles, three end-users pilot tested the app and participated in interviews.
Results:
Step 1 identified issues to be addressed when designing intervention objectives and features (Step 2a) and were mapped onto the Behaviour Change Wheel (Step 2b) to determine behaviour change techniques (e.g., action planning) to be included in the app. The logic model linked mechanisms of action to self-determination theory (steps 2/3). Interviews with end-users generated recommendations for the technology (e.g., comparing physical activity levels with guidelines), trial (e.g., emailing participants’ worksheets), and intervention content (e.g., removing ‘graded tasks’) (step 4).
Conclusions:
Using the SCI IKT guiding principles to guide partner engagement and involvement ensured that design partners had equal decision-making power in intervention development. Equal decision-making power maximizes the meaningfulness of the app for end-users. Future research will include testing program acceptability, feasibility, and engagement. Partners will be involved throughout the research process. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05063617
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.