Currently submitted to: JMIR Preprints
Date Submitted: Oct 13, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 13, 2021 - Sep 28, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Waiting Time and Patient Satisfaction in a Subspecialty Eye Hospital in Cameroon Using a Mobile Data Collection Kit: Pre and Post Quality Improvement Intervention
ABSTRACT
Background:
Waiting time could considerably increase the cost to both the clinic and the patient, as well as be a major predictor of the satisfaction of eye care users. Efficiently managing waiting time remains a challenge in hospitals. Waiting time management will become even more crucial in the post-pandemic era. A key consideration when improving waiting time is the involvement of eye care users. This study aimed at improving patient waiting time and satisfaction through the use of Plan-Do-Study-Act quality improvement cycles.
Objective:
The study’s objectives were to (1) determine the waiting time and patient satisfaction, (2) measure the association between waiting time and patient satisfaction, and (3) determine the effectiveness of the Plan-Do-Study-Act model in improving waiting time and satisfaction.
Methods:
This was a pre and post-quality improvement study among patients consulting with the Magrabi ICO Cameroon Eye Institute, aged 19-80 years. We made use of Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles to carry out improvement audits of waiting time and satisfaction over 6 weeks. A mobile data collection kit (ODK) was used for real-time tracking of waiting, service, and idling times at each service point. Subjects were also asked whether or not they were satisfied with waiting time at the point of exit. Data from 25 pre-intervention and 24 post-intervention subjects were analyzed in Stata14. An unpaired t-test was used to assess the statistical significance of observed differences in times pre and post-intervention. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between satisfaction and waiting time.
Results:
Forty-nine subjects were recruited with mean(SD) age 49(15.7) years. The pre-intervention mean(SD) waiting, service, and idling times were 449.6(96.6) minutes, 111.9(47.0) minutes, and 337.7(98.1) minutes respectively. There was no significant association between patient wait time and satisfaction (Odds Ratio=1.0; 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.0, P=.26; Chi2=.25). The use of Plan-Do-Study-Act led to a 14.5% (65.4/449.6) improvement in waiting time (t=2.0, df=47, P=.05) and a non-significant increase in patient satisfaction from 32% (8/25) to 33.3% (8/24) (z=0.1, P=.9).
Conclusions:
The use of PDSA led to a borderline statistically significant reduction of 65.4 minutes in waiting time over 6 weeks and an insignificant improvement in satisfaction, suggesting that quality improvement efforts have to be done over a considerable period to be able to produce significant changes. The study provides a good basis for quality improvement in limited-resource settings making use of block appointment systems, with comprehensive subspecialty eye care services. We recommend shortening the patient pathway and other measures including a phasic appointment system, automated patient time monitor, robust ticketing, patient pathway supervision, standard triaging, task shifting, doctor consultation planning, patient education, and additional registration staff.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.