Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Oct 13, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 13, 2021 - Oct 20, 2021
Date Accepted: Dec 30, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Asynchronous Remote Assessment for Cognitive Impairment: Reliability Verification of the Neurotrack Cognitive Battery

Myers JR, Glenn JM, Madero EN, Anderson J, Mak-McCully R, Gray M, Gills J, Harrison JE

Asynchronous Remote Assessment for Cognitive Impairment: Reliability Verification of the Neurotrack Cognitive Battery

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(2):e34237

DOI: 10.2196/34237

PMID: 35179511

PMCID: 8900894

Rising to the Challenge: Reliability Verification of an Asynchronous Remote Assessment for Cognitive Impairment

  • Jennifer Rae Myers; 
  • Jordan M Glenn; 
  • Erica N Madero; 
  • John Anderson; 
  • Rachel Mak-McCully; 
  • Michelle Gray; 
  • Joshua Gills; 
  • John E Harrison

ABSTRACT

Background:

Evidenced by the further reduced access to testing during the COVID-19 pandemic, there is an urgent, ever-growing need for remote cognitive assessment for individuals with cognitive impairment. The Neurotrack Cognitive Battery (NCB), our response to this need, was evaluated for its temporal reliability and stability as part of initial validation testing.

Objective:

To assess the temporal reliability of the NCB tests across a one-week period and to determine the temporal stability of these measures across three consecutive administrations in a single day.

Methods:

For test-retest reliability, 29-66 cognitively healthy participants completed each cognitive assessment twice, one week apart. In a separate study, temporal stability was assessed using data collected from 31 different cognitively healthy participants at 3 consecutive timepoints in a single day.

Results:

Correlations for the assessments were between .72-.83, exceeding the standard acceptable threshold of .70 for temporal reliability. Intraclass correlations ranged from .60-.84, indicating moderate to good temporal stability.

Conclusions:

These results demonstrate the clinical utility of NCB as a brief, easy to administer, and reliable assessment for remote cognitive testing.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Myers JR, Glenn JM, Madero EN, Anderson J, Mak-McCully R, Gray M, Gills J, Harrison JE

Asynchronous Remote Assessment for Cognitive Impairment: Reliability Verification of the Neurotrack Cognitive Battery

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(2):e34237

DOI: 10.2196/34237

PMID: 35179511

PMCID: 8900894

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.