Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Oct 8, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 8, 2021 - Dec 3, 2021
Date Accepted: Feb 24, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Inequities in Health Care Services Caused by the Adoption of Digital Health Technologies: Scoping Review

Yao R, Zhang W, Evans R, Cao G, Shen L

Inequities in Health Care Services Caused by the Adoption of Digital Health Technologies: Scoping Review

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(3):e34144

DOI: 10.2196/34144

PMID: 35311682

PMCID: 8981004

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Inequities in Healthcare Services caused by the Adoption of Digital Health Technologies: A Systematic Review

  • Rui Yao; 
  • Wenli Zhang; 
  • Richard Evans; 
  • Guang Cao; 
  • Lining Shen

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital health technologies are rapidly adapting to healthcare contexts to provide improved medical services to citizens. However, contrary to expectations, their rapid adoption appears to have led to health inequities.

Objective:

The aim of this study is to systematically review the inequities of healthcare services brought about by the adoption of digital health technologies. The influencing factors of inequities, as well as corresponding countermeasures to ensure the health equity between different groups of citizens, is also studied.

Methods:

A systematic review of literature published from 1990 to 2020 was completed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) review process, and the electronic databases of Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed, and Scopus. Search, sorting, and data extraction processes were completed by two authors of the paper using Thomson Endnote.

Results:

In total, 1,895 studies were collected during the search process, of which 40 were identified for analysis. The earliest literature identified was published in 1993, with the number remaining below 2 for a long period of time. The number started to increase until 2016, with a peak thereafter being reached in 2020. The United States, the United Kingdom, and Norway ranked as the top three in terms of publication output. Health inequities caused by digital health technologies were mainly reflected by access and availability of digital technologies and the differences in healthcare outcomes. The factors that influenced inequities included: demographic factors (i.e., gender, age, race, region, economy, and education level), health conditions, and eHealth literacy. Finally, government agencies and medical institutions, digital health technology providers, and healthcare service receivers can all take actions to alleviate inequities, in future.

Conclusions:

Findings provide a comprehensive starting point for future research allowing for further investigation into how digital health technologies may influence the unequal distribution of healthcare services. The interaction between individual subjective factors, as well as social support, and influencing factors should be included in future studies. In particular, access and availability to digital health technologies by vulnerable groups should be of paramount importance.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yao R, Zhang W, Evans R, Cao G, Shen L

Inequities in Health Care Services Caused by the Adoption of Digital Health Technologies: Scoping Review

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(3):e34144

DOI: 10.2196/34144

PMID: 35311682

PMCID: 8981004

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.