Perceptions of ADLs and In-Home ADL monitoring technology among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: a qualitative study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Many older adults prefer to remain in their own home for as long as possible, however there are still questions surrounding how best to ensure that an individual can cope with autonomous living. Technological monitoring systems are an attractive solution, but there is disagreement relating to Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and the optimal technologies which should be used to monitor them.
Objective:
To understand older adults’ perceptions of important ADLs and the types of technologies they would be willing to use within their own home.
Methods:
Semi-structured interviews were conducted online with 32 UK adults, divided equally into a ‘younger’ group (55-69years) and an ‘older’ group (70+years).
Results:
Both groups agreed that ADLs related to personal hygiene and feeding were the most important and highlighted the value of socialising. The ‘older’ group considered several activities to be more important than their younger counterparts, including stair use and foot care. The older group had less existing knowledge of monitoring technology but were more willing to accept wearable sensors than the younger group. The younger group preferred sensors placed within the home but highlighted that they would not have them until they felt that daily life was becoming a struggle.
Conclusions:
Overall, technological monitoring systems are perceived to be an acceptable method of monitoring ADLs. However, developers and carers need to be aware that individuals may express differences in willingness to engage with certain types of technology depending on their age and circumstances.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.