Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Sep 21, 2021
Date Accepted: Mar 25, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Perceptions of In-home Monitoring Technology for Activities of Daily Living: Semistructured Interview Study With Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Camp N, Johnston J, Lewis M, Zecca M, Di Nuovo A, Hunter K, Magistro D

Perceptions of In-home Monitoring Technology for Activities of Daily Living: Semistructured Interview Study With Community-Dwelling Older Adults

JMIR Aging 2022;5(2):e33714

DOI: 10.2196/33714

PMID: 35511248

PMCID: 9121226

Perceptions of ADLs and In-Home ADL monitoring technology among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: a qualitative study

  • Nicola Camp; 
  • Julie Johnston; 
  • Martin Lewis; 
  • Massimiliano Zecca; 
  • Alessandro Di Nuovo; 
  • Kirsty Hunter; 
  • Daniele Magistro

ABSTRACT

Background:

Many older adults prefer to remain in their own home for as long as possible, however there are still questions surrounding how best to ensure that an individual can cope with autonomous living. Technological monitoring systems are an attractive solution, but there is disagreement relating to Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and the optimal technologies which should be used to monitor them.

Objective:

To understand older adults’ perceptions of important ADLs and the types of technologies they would be willing to use within their own home.

Methods:

Semi-structured interviews were conducted online with 32 UK adults, divided equally into a ‘younger’ group (55-69years) and an ‘older’ group (70+years).

Results:

Both groups agreed that ADLs related to personal hygiene and feeding were the most important and highlighted the value of socialising. The ‘older’ group considered several activities to be more important than their younger counterparts, including stair use and foot care. The older group had less existing knowledge of monitoring technology but were more willing to accept wearable sensors than the younger group. The younger group preferred sensors placed within the home but highlighted that they would not have them until they felt that daily life was becoming a struggle.

Conclusions:

Overall, technological monitoring systems are perceived to be an acceptable method of monitoring ADLs. However, developers and carers need to be aware that individuals may express differences in willingness to engage with certain types of technology depending on their age and circumstances.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Camp N, Johnston J, Lewis M, Zecca M, Di Nuovo A, Hunter K, Magistro D

Perceptions of In-home Monitoring Technology for Activities of Daily Living: Semistructured Interview Study With Community-Dwelling Older Adults

JMIR Aging 2022;5(2):e33714

DOI: 10.2196/33714

PMID: 35511248

PMCID: 9121226

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.