Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Mar 15, 2022)

Date Submitted: Sep 19, 2021

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Exploring Visual Representation of #ShoutYourAbortion Hashtag Movement and the Public’s Responses on Instagram: Descriptive and Infodemiology Study

  • Sunmi ‍Lee; 
  • Yunhwan Kim

ABSTRACT

Background:

Hashtag movement has become one of the major ways of online movement, but few studies have examined how social media photos were used for the movement. Also, it has not been actively investigated how photo features were related to the public’s responses in hashtag movements.

Objective:

The aim of the present research was to explore Instagram photos with #ShoutYourAbortion hashtag, as an example of hashtag movements via photos, in terms of their visual representation and the relationships between photo features and the public’s responses to the photos.

Methods:

Instagram photos with #ShoutYourAbortion hashtag, 11,176 in total, were downloaded, and their content and embedded texts were analyzed using online artificial intelligence services. The photos were clustered into subgroups based on the features extracted using a pretrained convolutional neural network model. The resulting clusters were compared in terms of their content tags, embedded texts, and photo features which were manually extracted at the content and pixel levels. The public’s responses were measured by engagement and comment sentiment. Correlational analysis and predictive analytics were conducted to examine the relationships between photo features and the public’s responses.

Results:

It was found that the photos in the text category took the largest share (57.19%), and the embedded texts were mainly about stories told in first person point of view as a woman. A possible evidence of hashtag hijacking was observed. The photos were grouped into two clusters; the first cluster comprised photos which exhibit text materials on them, while the second cluster consisted of photos which contain human faces with texts. The photos in the first cluster were brighter, while the photos in the second cluster were more colorful than the others. And public responses were found to be related to photo features such as size of faces, happy emotion, and share of warm colors. Engagement was predicted from the photo features with an acceptable level of accuracy, while comment sentiment was not.

Conclusions:

This This study has shown the visual representation of #ShoutYourAbortion hashtag movement. It has also shown how photo features at content and pixel levels were related to the public’s responses to the photos. The results are expected to contribute to the understanding of hashtag movements via photos and making photos in hashtag movements more appealing to the public. Clinical Trial: Not Applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

‍Lee S, Kim Y

Exploring Visual Representation of #ShoutYourAbortion Hashtag Movement and the Public’s Responses on Instagram: Descriptive and Infodemiology Study

JMIR Preprints. 19/09/2021:33684

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.33684

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/33684

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.