Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Interactive Journal of Medical Research

Date Submitted: Sep 9, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 3, 2021 - Oct 29, 2021
Date Accepted: Mar 18, 2022
Date Submitted to PubMed: Apr 13, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Learning Agility of Learning and Development Professionals in the Life Sciences Field During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Study

Peng X, Wang-Trexler N, Magagna W, Land SM, Peck K

Learning Agility of Learning and Development Professionals in the Life Sciences Field During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Study

Interact J Med Res 2022;11(1):e33360

DOI: 10.2196/33360

PMID: 35417403

PMCID: 9045484

Learning Agility of Learning & Development Professionals in the Life-Sciences Field during the Pandemic: An Empirical Study

  • XinYun Peng; 
  • Nicole Wang-Trexler; 
  • William Magagna; 
  • Susan Mary Land; 
  • Kyle Peck

ABSTRACT

Background:

COVID-19 pandemic has changed organizations around the world in many ways. Learning & Development (L&D) departments within organizations underwent profound changes during the abrupt shift to remote work, and as a result, envisioned and implemented new work and training practices. Given the complex and dynamic situation of the pandemic, both individuals and organizations needed to learn quickly and apply what they learned to solve new, unprecedented problems. This situation presents an opportunity to study how characteristics of learning agility were evidenced by organizations and individual employees during the abrupt shift to remote learning brought about by the global pandemic.

Objective:

In collaboration with the StudySite [name blinded], this study investigated the responses and learning agility of L&D professionals and their organizational leadership within the life-sciences sector to the work changes due to the pandemic.

Methods:

We adopted a mixed methods approach that included a semi-structured interview and a survey. Interviews were conducted through phone or online conferencing and lasted 30-60 minutes each, covering 22 questions to stimulate ideas that could be used in the survey. The subsequent survey consisted of 37 items regarding 4 specific themes.

Results:

Findings reveal generally positive organizational and individual responses towards the changes brought about by the pandemic. Results also indicate that a disruptive crisis, like the abrupt shift to remote working, required professionals’ learning agility to both self-initiate their own learning and to support the learning agility of others in the organization.

Conclusions:

This is the second study in a series designed to better understand education and training in the life sciences on a macro level. We discussed several important directions for future research on learning agility of L&D professionals in life-sciences organizations.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Peng X, Wang-Trexler N, Magagna W, Land SM, Peck K

Learning Agility of Learning and Development Professionals in the Life Sciences Field During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Study

Interact J Med Res 2022;11(1):e33360

DOI: 10.2196/33360

PMID: 35417403

PMCID: 9045484

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.