Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Interactive Journal of Medical Research

Date Submitted: Sep 3, 2021
Date Accepted: Feb 11, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

A Machine Learning Approach to Predict the Outcome of Urinary Calculi Treatment Using Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Model Development and Validation Study

Moghisi R, El Morr C, Pace KT, Hajiha M, Huang J

A Machine Learning Approach to Predict the Outcome of Urinary Calculi Treatment Using Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Model Development and Validation Study

Interact J Med Res 2022;11(1):e33357

DOI: 10.2196/33357

PMID: 35293872

PMCID: 8968550

Machine Learning Approach to Predict Outcome of Urinary Calculi Treatment using Shockwave Lithotripsy

  • Reihaneh Moghisi; 
  • Christo El Morr; 
  • Kenneth T. Pace; 
  • Mohammad Hajiha; 
  • Jimmy Huang

ABSTRACT

Background:

Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), Ureteroscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) are established treatments for renal stones. Historically SWL has been a predominant and commonly used procedure for treating upper tract renal stones smaller than 20 mm in diameter due its noninvasive nature. However, the reported failure rate of SWL after one treatment session ranges from 30% to 60% (Yamashita et al. 2017). The failure rate can be reduced by identifying candidates likely to benefit from SWL and manage patients who are likely to fail SWL with other treatment modalities. This would enhance and optimize treatment results for SWL candidates.

Objective:

We proposed to develop a machine learning model that can predict SWL outcomes to assist practitioners in the decision-making process when considering patients for stone treatment.

Methods:

A dataset including 58,349 SWL procedures performed on 31,569 patient visits for SWL to a single hospital between 1990 and 2016 was used to construct and validate the predictive model. The AdaBoost algorithm was applied to a dataset with 17 predicting attributes related to patients’ information and stone characteristics, with success or failure as an outcome. The AdaBoost algorithm was applied to the dataset. The generated model’s performance was compared to that of 5 other machine learning algorithms, namely C4.5 decision tree, naïve Bayes, Bayesian network, K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and multilayer perceptron (MLP).

Results:

The developed model was validated with a testing dataset and had performed significantly better than the models generated by the other 5 predictive algorithms. The sensitivity of model was 0.875 and specificity 0.6528; while its positive predictive value was 0.7159 and negative predictive value 0.839. The C-statistics of the ROC analysis is 0.843 which reflects an excellent test.

Conclusions:

We have developed a rigorous machine learning model to assist physicians and decision makers to choose patients with renal stones who are most likely to have successful SWL treatment based on their demographics and stone characteristics. The proposed a machine learning model can assist physicians and decision makers in planning for SWL treatment and allow a more effective use of limited healthcare resources and improve patient prognoses.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Moghisi R, El Morr C, Pace KT, Hajiha M, Huang J

A Machine Learning Approach to Predict the Outcome of Urinary Calculi Treatment Using Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Model Development and Validation Study

Interact J Med Res 2022;11(1):e33357

DOI: 10.2196/33357

PMID: 35293872

PMCID: 8968550

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.