Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Sep 1, 2021
Date Accepted: Nov 27, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparison of Online Patient Reviews and National Pharmacovigilance Data for Tramadol-Related Adverse Events: Comparative Observational Study

Park S, Choi SH, Song YK, Kwon JW

Comparison of Online Patient Reviews and National Pharmacovigilance Data for Tramadol-Related Adverse Events: Comparative Observational Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2022;8(1):e33311

DOI: 10.2196/33311

PMID: 34982723

PMCID: 8767477

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Comparison of Online Patient’s Reviews and National Pharmacovigilance Data for Tramadol-Related Adverse Events: Comparative Observational Study

  • Susan Park; 
  • So-Hyun Choi; 
  • Yun-Kyung Song; 
  • Jin-Won Kwon

ABSTRACT

Background:

Tramadol is known to cause fewer adverse events (AE) than other opioids. However, recent research has raised concerns about various safety issues.

Objective:

We aimed to explore these new AE related to tramadol using social media and conventional pharmacovigilance data.

Methods:

This study used two datasets, one from patients’ drug reviews on WebMD and one from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). We analyzed 2,062 and 29,350 patient reports from WebMD and FAERS, respectively. Patient posts on WebMD were manually assigned the preferred terms of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). To analyze AE from FAERS, a disproportionality analysis was performed with three measures: the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the reporting odds ratio (ROR), and the information component (IC).

Results:

From the 869 AE reported, we identified 125 new signals related to tramadol use not listed on the drug label that satisfied all three signal detection criteria. In addition, 20 serious AE were selected from new signals. Among new serious AEs, vascular disorders had the largest signal detection criteria value. Based on the disproportionality analysis and patients’ symptom descriptions, tramadol-induced pain might also be an unexpected AE.

Conclusions:

This study detected several novel signals related to tramadol use, suggesting newly identified possible AE. Additionally, this study indicates that unexpected AEs can be detected using social media analysis alongside traditional pharmacovigilance data. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Park S, Choi SH, Song YK, Kwon JW

Comparison of Online Patient Reviews and National Pharmacovigilance Data for Tramadol-Related Adverse Events: Comparative Observational Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2022;8(1):e33311

DOI: 10.2196/33311

PMID: 34982723

PMCID: 8767477

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.