Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cancer
Date Submitted: Aug 24, 2021
Date Accepted: Nov 16, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Dec 2, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Telerehabilitation was safe, feasible and increased exercise uptake in cancer survivors: A process evaluation
ABSTRACT
Background:
Access to exercise for cancer survivors is poor despite global recognition about its benefits. Telerehabilitation may overcome barriers to exercise for cancer survivors but is not routinely offered.
Objective:
Following rapid implementation of an exercise-based telerehabilitation program in response to COVID-19, a process evaluation was conducted to understand the impact on patients, staff and the health service in the aim of informing future program development.
Methods:
A mixed methods evaluation of a telerehabilitation program for cancer survivors admitted between March and December 2020. Interviews were conducted with program participants and staff involved in implementation. Routinely collected hospital data (referral, admissions, costs, adverse events, physical activity and quality of life) were also assessed. Patients received an 8-week telerehabilitation intervention including one-on-one health coaching via telehealth, online group exercise and education, information portal and home exercise prescription. Quantitative data were reported descriptively, and qualitative interview data coded and mapped to the Proctor Model for Implementation Research.
Results:
The telerehabilitation program received 175 new referrals over 8-months. Of those eligible, 123/150 (82%) commenced. There were no major adverse events. Adherence to health coaching was high (80% scheduled sessions), but online group uptake was poor (n=36, 29%). Participants improved their self-reported physical activity levels (+110 minutes per week, IQR 90 to 401). Patients were satisfied with telerehabilitation, but clinicians reported a mixed experience of pride in rapid care delivery contrasting with loss of personal connections. The average health service cost per participant was AUD $1,104.
Conclusions:
Telerehabilitation is safe, feasible and improved outcomes for cancer survivors. Learnings from this study may inform the ongoing implementation of cancer telerehabilitation. Clinical Trial: not applicable
Citation
