Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics
Date Submitted: Aug 12, 2021
Date Accepted: Jan 9, 2022
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Operationalizing GPT-3 in Healthcare: An outlook of compliance, trust, and access for pretrained large AI linguistic models
ABSTRACT
Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models have been popular recently with their enhanced capability and performance. In contrast to many existing Artificial Intelligence (AI) models, GPT can perform with very limited training data. GPT-3 is one of the latest releases in this pipeline, demonstrating human-like logical and intellectual responses to prompts: some examples are including writing essays, complex question answering, matching pronouns to their noun, and sentiment analysis. However, its implementation in healthcare is still a question mark in terms of operationalization and its use in clinical practice and research. In this viewpoint paper, we outlined three major operational factors that drive the adoption of GPT-3 in healthcare: (1) Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliance, (2) building trust with healthcare providers, and (3) establishing the broader access to the GPT-3 tools.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.