Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR mHealth and uHealth (no longer under consideration since Oct 07, 2021)

Date Submitted: Aug 5, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 5, 2021 - Sep 30, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

A novel case-based reasoning system for breast cancer diagnosis: considering the effects of external characteristics of cases Abstract

  • Dongxiao Gu; 
  • Wang Zhao; 
  • Xuejie Yang; 
  • Kaixiang Su; 
  • Changyong Liang; 
  • Gongrang Zhang; 
  • Oleg V. Zolotarev

ABSTRACT

Background:

Artificial intelligence can help physicians improve the accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis. However, the effectiveness of AI applications is limited by doctors’ adoption of the results recommended by the AI systems. A case-based reasoning system for breast cancer diagnosis (CBR-BCD) that considers the effects of external characteristics of cases (ECC) can not only provide doctors with more accurate results for auxiliary diagnosis, but also improve doctors’ trust in the results, so as to encourage doctors to adopt the results recommended by the system.

Objective:

The objective of our study is to develop a novel integrated case-based reasoning (CBR) framework based on Naive Bayes and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) algorithms considering the effects of external characteristics of cases (CBR-ECC) and a corresponding system named CBR-BCD to assist in diagnosis and promote adoption by doctors.

Methods:

We used a real-world data set from the Maputo Central Hospital in Mozambique and constructed the CBR-ECC model and corresponding CBR-BCD system. We performed data processing and obtained six internal features and three external features of the cases. We randomly divided the 1214 cases into a training group and a testing group. The performance of the model was evaluated by accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results:

The system based on the CBR-ECC model was developed. In the first stage of this model, Naive Bayes showed the best performance, compared with KNN and J48 decision tree classifiers, with an accuracy rate of 95.87%. In the second stage, the accuracy of the KNN model with the optimal K value of 2 was 99.40%. In the third stage, after considering the external characteristics of the cases, the rankings of recommendation changed. Finally, we report the users’ evaluation of the novel CBR system in a real hospital scenario; we found that it is superior to the original system.

Conclusions:

CBR-BCD not only enables accurate case recommendations to support health practitioners in diagnosing breast cancer and reducing diagnostic inaccuracies, but also facilitates the adoption of system-recommended results by physicians, which is valuable for clinicians to assist in diagnosis. It enables the early screening of breast cancer to improve the quality of breast cancer management and reduces the socioeconomic burden compared to traditional methods.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Gu D, Zhao W, Yang X, Su K, Liang C, Zhang G, Zolotarev OV

A novel case-based reasoning system for breast cancer diagnosis: considering the effects of external characteristics of cases Abstract

JMIR Preprints. 05/08/2021:32652

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.32652

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/32652

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.