Previously submitted to: JMIRx Med (no longer under consideration since Jan 11, 2022)
Date Submitted: Aug 3, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 2, 2021 - Sep 27, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
COVID-19 Pandemic Analysis
ABSTRACT
Background:
Evolving infectious diseases are a continuing threat to public health, especially in democratic nations where persuasion is required to adjust population behavior to counter the threat. COVID-19 is particularly dangerous because one can be infected by inhaling air exhaled by an infectious person who may not even be symptomatic. Experience in 2020-2021 can be used to guide future control efforts.
Objective:
This investigation sought to understand the factors that controlled the development of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly the highs and lows in death rates as they were influenced by government leaders and media.
Methods:
Published data on COVID-19 death rates in eight selected nations and eleven selected U.S. states for the period 1 Mar. 2020 through 31 May 2021 were compared with calculations using a Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious-Recovered (SEIR) model that included an adjustment of the population’s basic reproduction number, R0, in response to information.
Results:
The death rates attributed to COVID-19 exhibited high peaks in most of the developed democratic nations in March/April 2020 and Dec. 2020/Jan. 2021. Initial values of R0 as high as 5.0 were deduced from the growth curves. The plateau near 700 deaths per million population reached in the summer of 2020 mirrored the effects of herd immunity in the model, but seroprevalence surveys proved that the population immune fraction was too low. An average of 169 people tested positive for COVID-19 antibodies for each death, i.e., more than twice the number of reported “cases” in the U.S. It was postulated that the March/April 2020 peak was primarily due to a ~20% fraction of the population that denied the threat and continued to interact normally. Nevertheless, toward the end of 2020 the general population relaxed its vigilance and another major peak in death rates occurred, even in areas that had suffered the most in the earlier peak. A reasonable selection of parameters for population response to information about “cases” and “deaths” produced the observed interval between peaks in the model and predicted a third peak in Sept. 2021 if less than 80% of the population were vaccinated.
Conclusions:
Cyclic death waves are manifestations of a classical control loop with its feedback delayed by disease progression, political controversy, and natural population inertia. The pandemic was prolonged in the U.S. because the population chose to keep R0 near 1.0 by relaxing restrictions once the death rate subsided. If no social restrictions had been adopted while the quality of medical care was sustained, approximately 1.6 million deaths would have resulted in the U.S. The vaccine, although developed and deployed at record speed, was too late to ameliorate this result.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.