Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Jul 28, 2021
Date Accepted: Sep 19, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Sep 20, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Prediction for Eyelid Measurements: Algorithm Development and Observational Validation Study

Chen HC, Tzeng SS, Hsiao YC, Chen RF, Hung EC, Lee OK

Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Prediction for Eyelid Measurements: Algorithm Development and Observational Validation Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(10):e32444

DOI: 10.2196/32444

PMID: 34538776

PMCID: 8538024

Eyelid Measurements: Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Prediction

  • Hung-Chang Chen; 
  • Shin-Shi Tzeng; 
  • Yen-Chang Hsiao; 
  • Ruei-Feng Chen; 
  • Erh-Chien Hung; 
  • Oscar K. Lee

ABSTRACT

Background:

Margin reflex distance 1(MRD1), margin reflex distance 2 (MRD2), and levator muscle function (LF) are crucial for ptosis evaluation and management. Manual measurements of MRD1, MRD2, and LF are time-consuming, subjective, and prone to human error. Smartphone-based artificial intelligence (AI) image processing is a potential solution to overcome these limitations.

Objective:

We proposed the first smartphone-based AI-assisted image processing algorithm for MRD1, MRD2, and LF measurements.

Methods:

This observational study included 822 eyes of 411 volunteers aged over 18 years from August 1, 2020, to April 30, 2021. Six orbital photographs (bilateral primary gaze, up-gaze, and down-gaze) were taken using a smartphone (iPhone 11 pro max). The gold standard measurements and normalized eye photographs were obtained from these orbital photographs and compiled using AI-assisted software to create MRD1, MRD2 and LF models.

Results:

The Pearson correlation coefficients between the gold standard measurements and the predicted values obtained with the MRD1 and MRD2 models were excellent (r = 0.91, and 0.88, respectively) and with the LF model were good (r = 0.73). The intraclass correlation coefficient results showed excellent agreement between the gold standard measurements and the values predicted by the MRD1and MRD2 models (0.90, and 0.84, respectively), and substantial agreement with the LF model (0.69). The mean absolute errors were 0.35 mm, 0.37 mm, and 1.06 mm for MRD1, MRD2, and LF models, respectively. The 95% limits of agreement were -0.94 to 0.94 mm for the MRD1 model; -0.92 to 1.03 mm for the MRD2 model; and -0.63 to 2.53 mm for the LF model.

Conclusions:

In this study, we proposed the first smartphone-based AI-assisted image processing algorithm for eyelid measurements. MRD1, MRD2, and LF measures can be taken in a quick, objective, and convenient manner. Furthermore, by using a smartphone, the examiner can check these measurements anywhere and at any time, which facilitates data collection.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Chen HC, Tzeng SS, Hsiao YC, Chen RF, Hung EC, Lee OK

Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Prediction for Eyelid Measurements: Algorithm Development and Observational Validation Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(10):e32444

DOI: 10.2196/32444

PMID: 34538776

PMCID: 8538024

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.