Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Jul 28, 2021
Date Accepted: May 12, 2022
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
The effectiveness of a pharmacy-based eHealth intervention promoting correct use of medication in patients with asthma and COPD: Results from a non-randomized pre-post study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affect millions of people worldwide. Whilst medication can control and improve disease symptoms, incorrect use of medication is a common problem. eHealth intervention ‘SARA’ aims to improve participants’ correct use of inhalation medication by providing information, as well as as-needed tailored follow-up support by a pharmacist.
Objective:
The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of SARA on exacerbation rates in participants with asthma and COPD. Secondary aims were to investigate its effects in terms of adherence to maintenance medication and antimycotic treatment.
Methods:
In this non-randomized pre-post study, medication dispensing data of 382 Dutch community pharmacies were included. Exacerbation rates were assessed with dispensed oral corticosteroids short courses. Medication adherence was assessed by calculating the proportion of days covered (PDC) from dispensed inhalation maintenance medication, wherefore a distinction was made between new and chronic users. Antimycotic treatment was investigated from dispensed oral antimycotics in participants who were also dispensed inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Outcomes were assessed one year before and one year after implementation of SARA and compared between SARA participants and control participants. More specifically, for exacerbation rates and medication adherence, a difference score was calculated (year after SARA minus year before SARA), and subsequently compared between the study groups with independent samples t-tests. For antimycotics, the relative number of participants who were dispensed antimycotics was calculated and subsequently analyzed with a mixed-effects logistic regression
Results:
The study population comprised 9,452 participants, of whom 2,400 were SARA participants. The mean age of the population was about 61, and approximately two-third was female. The results showed an increase in mean exacerbation rates over time for both study groups; 0.05 increase in SARA and 0.15 in controls. However this increase in exacerbations was significantly lower in the SARA condition (t9450= 3.10, 95% CI= 0.04 – 0.16, P= .002, Cohen d = 0.06). Chronic users of inhalation medication showed an increase in medication adherence over time in both study groups (6.73 in SARA and 4.48 control participants respectively); yet, this increase was significantly higher for SARA participants (t5886= -2.74, 95% CI= -3.86 – -0.84, P=.01, Cohen d = -0.07). In new users of inhalation medication, results showed no significant difference in medication adherence between SARA and controls in the year after implementation of SARA (t1434= -1.85, 95% CI= -5.60 – 0.16, P=.06, Cohen d = -0.10). In ICS-users, no significant differences between the study groups were found over time in terms of the proportion of participants who were dispensed antimycotics (t5654= 0.29, 95% CI= -0.40 - 0.54, P=.76, Cohen d = 0.00).
Conclusions:
This study provides preliminary evidence that eHealth intervention SARA might have the potential to decrease exacerbation rates and improve medication adherence.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.