Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jul 8, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 8, 2021 - Sep 2, 2021
Date Accepted: Feb 7, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Testing Digital Methods of Patient-Reported Outcomes Data Collection: Prospective Cluster Randomized Trial to Test SMS Text Messaging and Mobile Surveys

Agarwal A, Ali ZS, Shofer F, Xiong R, Hemmons J, Spencer E, Abdel-Rahman D, Sennett B, Delgado MK

Testing Digital Methods of Patient-Reported Outcomes Data Collection: Prospective Cluster Randomized Trial to Test SMS Text Messaging and Mobile Surveys

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(3):e31894

DOI: 10.2196/31894

PMID: 35298394

PMCID: 8972112

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Testing Digital Methods of Patient-Reported Outcomes Data Collection: A prospective, cluster randomized trial to test text messaging and mobile surveys.

  • Anish Agarwal; 
  • Zarina S Ali; 
  • Frances Shofer; 
  • Ruiying Xiong; 
  • Jessica Hemmons; 
  • Evan Spencer; 
  • Dina Abdel-Rahman; 
  • Brian Sennett; 
  • Mucio Kit Delgado

ABSTRACT

Background:

The growth of mobile and digital health data collection continues to accelerate in healthcare. Patient-reported outcomes are those data points collected from patients and there is a growing body of work to use mobile and digital methods to generate these data. Multiple methods exist in using technology to gather data with mobile surveys and text messaging. There remains a gap in evaluating these methods in prospective, randomized studies.

Objective:

To prospectively investigate two common methods of remote patient-reported outcomes data collection. The study sought to analyze response and engagement rates through two modalities including bi-directional text messaging or mobile surveys.

Methods:

Prospective, block randomized trial of adult patients undergoing elective sports medicine and orthopedic procedures over 6 weeks. The primary objective was to determine if the method of digital patient engagement would impact response and completion rates. The primary outcome was response rate and total competition of patient reported outcomes questionnaires.

Results:

127 participants were block randomized into either receiving a mobile survey (n=63) delivered as a hyperlink or were asked the same questions through an automated conversational text messaging (n=64). Gender, age, number of comorbidities, number of opioid tablets prescribed were similar across messaging arms. Overall engagement over the immediate post-operative was similar between the messaging arms. Prolonged engagement past post-operative day 4 was higher in the mobile survey arm at day 7 (95% vs. 56%). Patients with more invasive procedures showed a trend toward being responsive at day 4 as compared to non-responders.

Conclusions:

As digital platforms become more commonly used in health care, testing the various options to engage patients to gather data is crucial to inform future care and research. We found that globally bi-directional text messaging and mobile surveys were comparable in response and engagement rates, however mobile surveys may trend toward higher response rates over longer periods of time.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Agarwal A, Ali ZS, Shofer F, Xiong R, Hemmons J, Spencer E, Abdel-Rahman D, Sennett B, Delgado MK

Testing Digital Methods of Patient-Reported Outcomes Data Collection: Prospective Cluster Randomized Trial to Test SMS Text Messaging and Mobile Surveys

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(3):e31894

DOI: 10.2196/31894

PMID: 35298394

PMCID: 8972112

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.