Previously submitted to: JMIR Human Factors (no longer under consideration since May 20, 2022)
Date Submitted: Jul 17, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 6, 2021 - Aug 31, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Analyzing Opioid-Use Disorder Websites In The United States: An Optimized Website Usability Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
As the United States continues to tackle the opioid epidemic, it is imperative for digital healthcare organizations to provide internet users accurate and accessible online resources so that they can make informed decisions with regards to their health. The aim of this study was to analyze the usability of opioid-use disorder (OUD) websites.
Objective:
The primary objectives of this study were based on the objectives established by previous literature but were adapted towards analyzing usability of OUD-related websites. The objectives were to adapt and modify a previously established usability methodology from literature, apply this modified methodology in order to analyze OUD websites, and make important recommendations that OUD-related digital health organizations may utilize to improve their online presence.
Methods:
A list of 208 websites (later refined to sample size of “n=96” websites) were generated for usability testing using a modified Google search methodology established by previous literature. Four keywords were chosen and used in the search: “DEA-X Waiver Training”, “OUD Initiatives”, “Buprenorphine Assisted Treatment” and “Opioid-Use Disorder Websites”. The list was compiled between April 20, 2021 and April 23, 2021. Using an usability methodology established by previous literature, website usability testing was performed from April 24, 2021 to May 19, 2021. Usability analysis was performed concurrently with optimization of the methodology. OUD websites were analyzed and scored on several usability categories.
Results:
“DEA-X Waiver Training” yielded websites that scored the highest average in “Accessibility” (0.84), while “Opioid-Use Disorder Websites” yielded websites that scored the highest average in “Content Quality” (0.67). “Buprenorphine Assisted Treatment” yielded websites that scored the highest average across “Marketing” (0.52), “Technology” (0.89), “General Usability” (0.69), and “Overall Usability” (0.68). “Technology” was the highest scoring usability category among all of the keywords. “Marketing” was the lowest scoring category among all keywords. Statistical T-test analysis revealed that each usability, except “Marketing” had a pair of one or more keywords that were significantly different with a P-value that was equal to or less than 0.05.
Conclusions:
Based on the findings, we recommend that digital organizations in the OUD space should improve their “General Usability” score by making their websites more discoverable (thereby improving their “Marketing” usability score as well). Doing so, may allow many users, especially individuals in the OUD space, to discover pertinent and accurate information that they are seeking. In conclusion, the primary objectives of this study were addressed. A previously established usability methodology was adapted and modified for the analysis of OUD websites. Based on the study findings, we made important recommendations that OUD-related digital organizations may utilize in order to improve website usability as well as overall reach.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.