Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jul 5, 2021
Date Accepted: Dec 6, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Best Practices and Lessons Learned for Action Research in eHealth Design and Implementation: Literature Review

Oberschmidt K, Grünloh C, Nijboer F, van Velsen L

Best Practices and Lessons Learned for Action Research in eHealth Design and Implementation: Literature Review

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(1):e31795

DOI: 10.2196/31795

PMID: 35089158

PMCID: 8838546

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Action Research in eHealth design and implementation: A literature review of best practices and lessons learned

  • Kira Oberschmidt; 
  • Christiane Grünloh; 
  • Femke Nijboer; 
  • Lex van Velsen

ABSTRACT

Background:

Action Research (AR) is an established research framework to introduce change in a community following a cyclical approach and involving stakeholders as co-researchers in the process. In recent years, it has also been used for eHealth development. However, little is known about the best practices and lessons learned of utilizing AR for eHealth development.

Objective:

his literature review aims to provide more knowledge on best practices and lessons learned from eHealth AR studies. Additionally, an overview of the context in which AR eHealth studies take place is given.

Methods:

A semi-systematic review of 44 papers reporting on 40 different AR projects was conducted to identify best practices and lessons learned in the research studies while taking into account the particular contextual setting and used AR model.

Results:

Important recommendations include attention for the training of stakeholders’ academic skills, as well as the various roles and tasks of action researchers. The studies also highlight the need for constant reflection and for accessible dissemination suiting the target group.

Conclusions:

The literature review identified room for improvements regarding communicating and specifying the particular AR definition and applied model.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Oberschmidt K, Grünloh C, Nijboer F, van Velsen L

Best Practices and Lessons Learned for Action Research in eHealth Design and Implementation: Literature Review

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(1):e31795

DOI: 10.2196/31795

PMID: 35089158

PMCID: 8838546

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.