Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Jun 22, 2021
Date Accepted: Jan 3, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Multisensory Home-Monitoring in Individuals With Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma: Usability Study of the CAir-Desk

Kohlbrenner D, Clarenbach CF, Ivankay A, Zimmerli L, Gross CS, Kuhn M, Brunschwiler T

Multisensory Home-Monitoring in Individuals With Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma: Usability Study of the CAir-Desk

JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(1):e31448

DOI: 10.2196/31448

PMID: 35171107

PMCID: 8892320

Multisensory home-monitoring in individuals with stable COPD and Asthma: a usability study of the CAir-Desk

  • Dario Kohlbrenner; 
  • Christian F. Clarenbach; 
  • Adam Ivankay; 
  • Lukas Zimmerli; 
  • Christoph S. Gross; 
  • Manuel Kuhn; 
  • Thomas Brunschwiler

ABSTRACT

Background:

Research integrating multisensory home-monitoring in respiratory disease is scarce. Therefore, we created a novel multisensory home-monitoring device tailored for long-term respiratory disease management (named the CAir-Desk). We hypothesize that recent technological accomplishments can be integrated into a multisensory participant-driven platform. We also believe that this platform could improve chronic disease management, and be accessible to large groups at an acceptable cost.

Objective:

To report on user-adherence and acceptance, as well as system functionality of the CAir-Desk in a sample of participants with stable COPD or Asthma.

Methods:

We conducted an observational usability study. Participants participated in 4 weeks of home-monitoring with the CAir-Desk. The CAir-Desk recorded data from all participants on symptom burden, physical activity, spirometry, and environmental air-quality; data on sputum production, and nocturnal cough was only recorded in participants experiencing the symptoms. After the study period, participants reported on their perceptions of the monitoring device usability through a purpose-designed questionnaire. We used descriptive statistics and visualizations to display results.

Results:

Ten participants, 5 with COPD and 5 with Asthma took part in this study. They completed symptom burden questionnaires on 96 (14, 96)%, spirometry recordings on 55 (20, 94)%, wrist-worn physical activity recordings on 100 (97, 100)%, arm-worn physical activity recordings on 45 (13, 63)%, nocturnal cough recordings on 34 (9, 54)%, sputum recordings on 5 (3, 12)%, and environmental air-quality recordings on 100 (99, 100)% of the study days. The participants indicated that the measurements consumed 13 (10, 15) min daily, and that they preferred the wrist-worn over the arm-worn physical activity monitor.

Conclusions:

The CAir-Desk showed good technical performance and was well-accepted by our sample of stable COPD and Asthma participants. The obtained insights were used in a redesign of the CAir-Desk, which is currently applied in a RCT including an interventional program. Clinical Trial: NA


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kohlbrenner D, Clarenbach CF, Ivankay A, Zimmerli L, Gross CS, Kuhn M, Brunschwiler T

Multisensory Home-Monitoring in Individuals With Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma: Usability Study of the CAir-Desk

JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(1):e31448

DOI: 10.2196/31448

PMID: 35171107

PMCID: 8892320

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.