Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Jun 21, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 21, 2021 - Jun 29, 2021
Date Accepted: Aug 24, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 31, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Patterns of Missing Data with Ecological Momentary Assessment: Feasibility Report from a Pilot Study of People Who Use Drugs
ABSTRACT
Background:
Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is a set of research methods that capture events, feelings, and behaviors as they unfold in their “real world” setting. Capturing data “in the moment” reduces important sources of measurement error but also generates challenges for non-compliance (i.e., missing data). To date, past EMA research has only examined overall rates of non-compliance.
Objective:
We identify four types of non-compliance among people who use drugs (PWUD) and examine the factors associated with each.
Methods:
Data are from a recent pilot study of 28 Nebraskan PWUD who answered EMA quetstions for two weeks. We examine questions that were not answered because they were skipped, they expired, the phone was off, or the phone died after receiving them.
Results:
We find that the phone being off and questions expiring comprise 93% of our missing data. Generalized structural equation model results show that participant-level factors, including age (RRR=0.93, P=.005), gender (RRR=0.08, P=.006), homelessness (RRR=3.80, P=.04), personal device ownership (RRR=0.14, P=.008), and network size (RRR=0.57, P=.001), are important for predicting off missingness, while only question-level factors, including time of day (i.e., morning compared to noon/afternoon, RRR=0.55, P<.001) and day of week (i.e., Tuesday-Saturday compared to Sunday, RRR=0.70, P=.02, RRR=0.64, P=.005, RRR=0.58, P=.001, RRR=0.55, P<.001, RRR=0.66, P=.008) are important for predicting expired missingness. Week of study is important for both (i.e., week two compared to week one, RRR=1.21, P=.03 for off missingness, RRR=1.98, P<.001 for expired missingess).
Conclusions:
We suggest a three-pronged strategy to preempt missing EMA data with high-risk populations: 1) provide additional resources for participants likely to experience phone charging problems (e.g., the homeless); 2) ask questions when participants are not likely to experience competing demands (e.g., morning); and 3) incentivize continued compliance as the study progresses. Attending to these issues can help researchers ensure maximal data quality.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.