Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jun 11, 2021
Date Accepted: Apr 27, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluation of Web-Based Health Information From the Perspective of Women With Eating Disorders: Thematic Analysis

Drtilova H, Machackova H, Smahelova M

Evaluation of Web-Based Health Information From the Perspective of Women With Eating Disorders: Thematic Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(6):e31148

DOI: 10.2196/31148

PMID: 35699984

PMCID: 9237763

Evaluation of Online Health Information from the Perspective of Women with Eating Disorders: Thematic Analysis

  • Hana Drtilova; 
  • Hana Machackova; 
  • Martina Smahelova

ABSTRACT

Background:

Users with eating disorder experience use the Internet as a source of information, whether for pro-recovery activities (such as online treatment, looking for information, support, sharing, etc.) or activities that promote eating disorder behavior as a desirable lifestyle choice (such as pro-eating disorder communities, reading and creating pro-eating disorder posts, etc.). Their assessment of online eating disorder-related information can be crucial for understanding the context of illness and for health professionals and their online interventions.

Objective:

This study aimed to understand what criteria young women with eating disorder experience use in evaluating eating disorder-related online information and what eating disorder-related characteristics of these women are involved in their evaluation.

Methods:

We analyzed 30 semi-structured individual interviews with Czech women aged 16-28 with past or present eating disorder experience using a qualitative approach. Thematic analysis was adopted as an analytical tool.

Results:

The specifics of eating disorder phases (the "disorder stage" and the "treatment process") emerged as important aspects in the process of information assessment. Other specific characteristics of respondents (such as motivation, abilities, and resources) addressed how respondents arrived at certain online information and how they evaluated it. In addition, respondents described some content cues as the features of information (such as novelty, social information pooling). Another finding is how other users' attitudes, experiences, activities, and personal features are involved in the information evaluation of these users and the information presented by them. Finally, respondents evaluated the websites' visual look and graphic components.

Conclusions:

The present study shows that online information evaluation reported by women with eating disorder experience is a complex process. The assessment is influenced by current personal characteristics connected to the illness (mainly the motivation for maintaining or curing the eating disorder), using cues associated with information content, other users, and website look. Study findings enlighten important implications for health professionals, who should ask their clients questions about online communities and their needs to understand what information and sources they choose.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Drtilova H, Machackova H, Smahelova M

Evaluation of Web-Based Health Information From the Perspective of Women With Eating Disorders: Thematic Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(6):e31148

DOI: 10.2196/31148

PMID: 35699984

PMCID: 9237763

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.