Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Jun 7, 2021
Date Accepted: Dec 20, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparing Reminders Sent via SMS Text Messaging and Email for Improving Adherence to an Electronic Health Program: Randomized Controlled Trial

Kulhánek A, Lukavska K, Gabrhelík R, Novák D, Burda V, Prokop J, Holter MTS, Brendryen H

Comparing Reminders Sent via SMS Text Messaging and Email for Improving Adherence to an Electronic Health Program: Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022;10(3):e31040

DOI: 10.2196/31040

PMID: 35302945

PMCID: 8976257

Improving Adherence to an eHealth Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Reminders by Text Message with E-mail

  • Adam Kulhánek; 
  • Katerina Lukavska; 
  • Roman Gabrhelík; 
  • Daniel Novák; 
  • Václav Burda; 
  • Jindřich Prokop; 
  • Marianne T. S. Holter; 
  • Håvar Brendryen

ABSTRACT

Background:

EHealth interventions can help people change behavior, e.g., quit smoking. Reminders by text message (SMS) or e-mail may improve the adherence to web-based programs and increase the probability of successful behavior change, but whether their efficiency is affected by the modality of the communication channel is unclear.

Objective:

A two-armed randomized control trial was conducted to compare the effect of providing reminders via text messages (SMS) versus e-mail on the adherence to an eHealth program for smoking cessation and on the probability to initiate a quitting attempt.

Methods:

Smokers were recruited via online advertisement. A total of 591 participants who diverted from intended use of the program (i.e., failed to log on to a session) were automatically randomized to the experimental (SMS reminder) or the active comparator (e-mail reminder) group.

Results:

Unexpectedly, we found that the mode of the reminders’ delivery did not significantly affect either the adherence, i.e., the number of completed program sessions: SMS reminders group mean 4.30 (SD 3.24); e-mail reminders group mean 4.36 (SD 3.27); t586=0.197, P=.844, Cohen d=0.016) or the outcome, i.e., quit smoking attempt rate (34.2% in SMS group vs. 31.7% in e-mail group, χ²1=0.4, P=.52. Secondary analyses showed that age, gender and education had significant effects on program adherence and education on outcome. Moreover, we found a significant interaction effect between mode of reminder delivery and gender on program adherence, suggesting that the effectivity of SMS reminders might be different for females and males. However, this particular finding should be treated with care as it was based on post-hoc subgroup analysis.

Conclusions:

This study indicates that the modality of user reminders to log on did not increase neither program adherence nor the probability of quitting smoking. This suggests that program developers may save costs using e-mails instead of SMS reminders. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03276767


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kulhánek A, Lukavska K, Gabrhelík R, Novák D, Burda V, Prokop J, Holter MTS, Brendryen H

Comparing Reminders Sent via SMS Text Messaging and Email for Improving Adherence to an Electronic Health Program: Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022;10(3):e31040

DOI: 10.2196/31040

PMID: 35302945

PMCID: 8976257

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.