Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors
Date Submitted: Jun 1, 2021
Date Accepted: Aug 2, 2021
Access, Use and Patient Reported Experiences of Emergency Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Population-Based Survey
ABSTRACT
Background:
An increase in the number of people presenting to Emergency Departments (EDs) is contributing to ED overcrowding. In the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a significant reduction in the number of ED presentations in Australia, creating an opportunity to learn from patients experiences of alternative management options.
Objective:
To report on the use and experience of health services by Australian adults experiencing a health issue during the COVID-19 pandemic, for which they would have presented at an Emergency Department (ED) prior to the pandemic.
Methods:
An online survey was conducted in May 2020. Reported health issues were categorized using an existing classification system. Data collected included demographics, care pathways, levels of concern at times of health issue and survey completion and patient reported experiences with care.
Results:
1,289 eligible respondents completed the survey. Almost 25% of respondents avoided an ED presentation, of which 60% used an alternative form of health care and 40% self-managed. Respondents making face-to-face or telehealth appointments with their general practitioner (GP) reported high levels of ED avoidance and mostly positive experiences of care provided by GPs. A high proportion of those who self-managed reported high levels of concern at the time of completing the survey.
Conclusions:
Telehealth consultations with GPs may be a more promotable alternative to the ED beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, providing easier access to a doctor with access to patients’ medical histories than a booking for a face-to-face consultation. GP telehealth consultations may also address barriers to accessing health care for those with potentially the greatest need. The reported use and positive experiences with GP telehealth appointments should inform further research on their appropriateness as an alternative to the ED. Clinical Trial: N/a
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.