Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jun 1, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 1, 2021 - Jul 27, 2021
Date Accepted: Jan 26, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Prioritizing Support Offered to Caregivers by Examining the Status Quo and Opportunities for Enhancement When Using Web-Based Self-reported Health Questionnaires: Descriptive Qualitative Study

Coles T, Lucas N, Daniell E, Sullivan C, Wang K, Olsen J, Shepherd-Banigan M

Prioritizing Support Offered to Caregivers by Examining the Status Quo and Opportunities for Enhancement When Using Web-Based Self-reported Health Questionnaires: Descriptive Qualitative Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(4):e30877

DOI: 10.2196/30877

PMID: 35394436

PMCID: 9034415

Prioritizing Support Offered to Caregivers: Status Quo and Opportunities for Enhancement using Web-based Self-reported Health Questionnaires

  • Theresa Coles; 
  • Nicole Lucas; 
  • Erin Daniell; 
  • Caitlin Sullivan; 
  • Ke Wang; 
  • Jennifer Olsen; 
  • Megan Shepherd-Banigan

ABSTRACT

Background:

The Rosalynn Carter Institute for Caregivers (RCI) offers evidence-based interventions to promote the health and well-being of caregivers. Trained coaches meet with caregivers regularly to offer education and instruction to improve caregiver health, skill sets, and increase resilience. Two of these interventions, RCI Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer’s Caregiver Health (RCI REACH) and Operation Family Caregiver (OFC), use a set of caregiver-reported questionnaires to monitor caregiver health status and needs.

Objective:

This study describes how web-based assessment questionnaires are currently being used to identify and monitor caregiver status in the RCI REACH and OFC programs, as well as outline perceived enhancements to the web-based system that could support caregiver-coach encounters by directing priorities.

Methods:

This is a qualitative descriptive study. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews with caregivers and coaches within the RCI REACH and OFC programs from July 2020 to October 2020. During the interviews, participants were asked to describe how the assessment questionnaires were used to inform caregiver-coach encounters, perceived usefulness of enhancements to web-based display, and preference for structure of score results. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded using structural and interpretive codes from a structured codebook. Qualitative content analysis was used to identify themes and summarize results.

Results:

A total of 25 caregivers (RCI REACH=13; OFC=12) and 11 coaches (RCI REACH=5; OFC=6) were interviewed. Most caregivers indicated that the assessment questions were relevant for their caregiving experiences. Some caregivers and coaches indicated that they thought the assessment should be administered multiple times throughout the program to evaluate caregiver progress. Overall, caregivers did not want their scores to be compared with other caregivers, and there was heterogeneity in how caregivers preferred to view their results; at the question level or topic level. Coaches were uncertain which and how much of the results from the self-reported questionnaires should be shared with caregivers. Overall, results were very similar regardless of program affiliation (RCI REACH vs. OFC).

Conclusions:

Web-based and procedural enhancements were identified to enrich caregiver-coach encounters. New and enhanced strategies for using the web-based assessment questionnaires to direct priorities in the caregiver-coach encounters included: 1) integrating figures showing caregiver progress at the individual caregiver level; 2) ability to toggle results through different figures focused on individual vs. aggregate results; and 3) support for interpreting scores. Results of this qualitative study drive the next steps for RCI’s web-based platform and expand on current standards for administering self-reported questionnaires in clinical practice settings. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Coles T, Lucas N, Daniell E, Sullivan C, Wang K, Olsen J, Shepherd-Banigan M

Prioritizing Support Offered to Caregivers by Examining the Status Quo and Opportunities for Enhancement When Using Web-Based Self-reported Health Questionnaires: Descriptive Qualitative Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(4):e30877

DOI: 10.2196/30877

PMID: 35394436

PMCID: 9034415

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.