Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jun 1, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 1, 2021 - Jul 27, 2021
Date Accepted: Jul 27, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 3, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparison of the Differences Between Web-Based and Traditional Questionnaire Surveys in Pediatrics: Comparative Survey Study

Fang H, Xian R, Ma Z, Lu M, Hu Y

Comparison of the Differences Between Web-Based and Traditional Questionnaire Surveys in Pediatrics: Comparative Survey Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(8):e30861

DOI: 10.2196/30861

PMID: 34319240

PMCID: 8430848

Comparison of the differences between web-based and traditional questionnaire surveys in pediatrics: Comparative Survey Study

  • Heping Fang; 
  • Ruoling Xian; 
  • Zhuoying Ma; 
  • Mingyue Lu; 
  • Yan Hu

ABSTRACT

Background:

The web-based survey is a novel method for data capture. Some studies have applied web-based survey in pediatrics, but few of them have reported the data on the differences between it and traditional questionnaire surveys.

Objective:

The objective of our study was to evaluate the internal consistency of web-based survey and to compare it with traditional questionnaire survey in pediatrics.

Methods:

A convenience sample of caregivers were invited to participate in the survey on the feeding patterns and their children’s eating behavior if their children were aged 2 to 7 years. A web-based survey and a traditional questionnaire survey were carried out between October 2018 and July 2019. A total of 1085 caregivers were involved in this study, and they were divided into 3 groups based on the methods and sources: (1) web-based survey from web source, (1) web-based survey from hospital source, (3) traditional questionnaire survey from hospital source. The data were then compared and analyzed.

Results:

A total of 735 caregivers participated in the web-based survey and 350 caregivers participated in the traditional questionnaire survey, and 816 cases were then included in the analyses after data processing. The effective rate of the web-based survey was 70.1% and the completeness rate of the traditional questionnaire survey was 86.0%. The data showed that there were no significant differences between web-based surveys from different sources. But the demographic characteristics between the web-based and traditional questionnaire surveys were significantly different, mainly in age and caregivers (P=.002 and P<.001). Age-specific stratified analysis then showed the scores of feeding patterns and reporting rates of eating behavior problems were significantly higher in the web-based survey compared to the traditional questionnaire survey, mainly in the younger age group after adjusting for demographic characteristics.

Conclusions:

Taken together, our study demonstrated that web-based survey could be a feasible tool in pediatric studies. However, differences in demographic characteristics and their possible impact on the results should be considered in the analyses.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Fang H, Xian R, Ma Z, Lu M, Hu Y

Comparison of the Differences Between Web-Based and Traditional Questionnaire Surveys in Pediatrics: Comparative Survey Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(8):e30861

DOI: 10.2196/30861

PMID: 34319240

PMCID: 8430848

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.