Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: May 29, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: May 28, 2021 - Jul 23, 2021
Date Accepted: Jul 22, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 18, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Framing of and Attention to COVID-19 on Twitter: Thematic Analysis of Hashtags

Tahamtan I, Potnis D, Mohammadi E, Miller LE, Singh V

Framing of and Attention to COVID-19 on Twitter: Thematic Analysis of Hashtags

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(9):e30800

DOI: 10.2196/30800

PMID: 34406961

PMCID: 8437404

Framing of and Attention to COVID-19 on Twitter: A Thematic Analysis of Hashtags

  • Iman Tahamtan; 
  • Devendra Potnis; 
  • Ehsan Mohammadi; 
  • Laura E. Miller; 
  • Vandana Singh

ABSTRACT

Background:

Although past research focuses on how COVID-19 has been framed by the mainstream news media, such research may not accurately capture and represent the perspectives of people from diverse backgrounds. Additionally, public attention to the COVID-19 frames on social media has not been adequately explored in previous studies. The amount of public attention to frames can reflect how much effect they have had on public opinion.

Objective:

To fill the gap in the literature, this study identifies the frames about the COVID-19 pandemic in public discourse on Twitter, which voices diverse opinions. This study also investigates the amount of public attention the identified frames have received on Twitter.

Methods:

Twenty-two trending hashtags related to COVID-19 in the US and 694,582 tweets containing these hashtags written in English were collected and analyzed in March 2020 via thematic analysis. Public attention was measured by evaluating the amount of public engagement with frames (ranged from 0 to 1) and public adoption of those frames (ranged from 0 to1).

Results:

Nine frames were identified, including ‘public health guidelines,’ ‘quarantine life,’ ‘solidarity,’ ‘evidence and facts,’ ‘call for action,’ ‘politics,’ ‘post-pandemic life,’ ‘shortage panic,’ and ‘conflict.’ We found that the identified frames manifest the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic experienced by Twitter users. Results indicated that ‘call for action’ had the highest engagement score (0.68), followed by ‘conflict’ (0.67), and ‘evidence and facts’ (0.59). Additionally, ‘post-pandemic life’ had the highest adoption score (0.99) followed by ‘call for action’ (0.92), and ‘shortage panic’ (0.91).

Conclusions:

Results indicated that framing can be an effective tool to gauge the concerns and needs of citizens during public health emergencies. The typology of frames identified in this study could also be used to facilitate the communication of various aspects of COVID-19 on social media. The frames with greater public attention could possibly be more relevant to people’s concerns or interests. This study also contributes to the framing research by demonstrating that trending hashtags can be used as a new user-generated data source to identify and highlight frames in public discourse on social media.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tahamtan I, Potnis D, Mohammadi E, Miller LE, Singh V

Framing of and Attention to COVID-19 on Twitter: Thematic Analysis of Hashtags

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(9):e30800

DOI: 10.2196/30800

PMID: 34406961

PMCID: 8437404

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.