Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIRx Med

Date Submitted: May 28, 2021
Date Accepted: Jan 27, 2022
Date Submitted to PubMed: Sep 19, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Association of Shared Care Networks With 30-Day Heart Failure Excessive Hospital Readmissions: Longitudinal Observational Study

Pinheiro D, Hartman R, Mai J, Romero E, Soroya S, Bastos-Filho C, Lima R, Gibson M, Ebong I, Bidwell J, Nuno M, Cadeiras M

The Association of Shared Care Networks With 30-Day Heart Failure Excessive Hospital Readmissions: Longitudinal Observational Study

JMIRx Med 2022;3(2):e30777

DOI: 10.2196/30777

PMID: 37725539

PMCID: 10414461

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Association of Shared Care Networks with Heart Failure Excessive Hospital Readmissions

  • Diego Pinheiro; 
  • Ryan Hartman; 
  • Jing Mai; 
  • Erick Romero; 
  • Saad Soroya; 
  • Carmelo Bastos-Filho; 
  • Ricardo Lima; 
  • Michael Gibson; 
  • Imo Ebong; 
  • Julie Bidwell; 
  • Miriam Nuno; 
  • Martin Cadeiras

Background:

Higher-than-expected heart failure (HF) readmissions affect half of US hospitals every year. The Hospital Reduction Readmission Program has reduced risk-adjusted readmissions, but it has also produced unintended consequences. Shared care models have been advocated for HF care, but the association of shared care networks with HF readmissions has never been investigated.

Objective:

This study aims to evaluate the association of shared care networks with 30-day HF excessive readmission rates using a longitudinal observational study.

Methods:

We curated publicly available data on hospital discharges and HF excessive readmission ratios from hospitals in California between 2012 and 2017. Shared care areas were delineated as data-driven units of care coordination emerging from discharge networks. The localization index, the proportion of patients who reside in the same shared care area in which they are admitted, was calculated by year. Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the association between the localization index and the excessive readmission ratio of hospitals controlling for race/ethnicity and socioeconomic factors.

Results:

A total of 300 hospitals in California in a 6-year period were included. The HF excessive readmission ratio was negatively associated with the adjusted localization index (β=–.0474, 95% CI –0.082 to –0.013). The percentage of Black residents within the shared care areas was the only statistically significant covariate (β=.4128, 95% CI 0.302 to 0.524).

Conclusions:

Higher-than-expected HF readmissions were associated with shared care networks. Control mechanisms such as the Hospital Reduction Readmission Program may need to characterize and reward shared care to guide hospitals toward a more organized HF care system.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Pinheiro D, Hartman R, Mai J, Romero E, Soroya S, Bastos-Filho C, Lima R, Gibson M, Ebong I, Bidwell J, Nuno M, Cadeiras M

The Association of Shared Care Networks With 30-Day Heart Failure Excessive Hospital Readmissions: Longitudinal Observational Study

JMIRx Med 2022;3(2):e30777

DOI: 10.2196/30777

PMID: 37725539

PMCID: 10414461

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.