Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jun 16, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 9, 2021 - Jun 24, 2021
Date Accepted: Aug 2, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

How Should Oncologists Choose an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System for Remote Monitoring of Patients With Cancer?

Denis F, Krakowski I

How Should Oncologists Choose an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System for Remote Monitoring of Patients With Cancer?

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(9):e30549

DOI: 10.2196/30549

PMID: 34499046

PMCID: 8461535

Which Electronic Patient’s Reported Outcome System should I choose for Remote Monitoring of my Cancer Patients?

  • Fabrice Denis; 
  • Ivan Krakowski

ABSTRACT

Abstract Digital electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO) systems for symptom monitoring in cancer patients demonstrated evidence of quality of life and survival benefit in controlled trials. They are beginning to be used in routine oncology practice. Many software editors provide solutions to clinicians but how can clinician choose it? We propose a synthesis of the main questions about effectiveness, safety and functionality of ePRO system that may ask clinician to software providers to be helped in selecting a software in order to obtain the best value of these tools for their patients and their practice.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Denis F, Krakowski I

How Should Oncologists Choose an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System for Remote Monitoring of Patients With Cancer?

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(9):e30549

DOI: 10.2196/30549

PMID: 34499046

PMCID: 8461535

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.