Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: May 19, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: May 19, 2021 - Jul 14, 2021
Date Accepted: Sep 22, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Algorithm Change Protocols in the Regulation of Adaptive Machine Learning–Based Medical Devices

Gilbert S, Fenech M, Hirsch M, Upadhyay S, Biasiucci A, Starlinger J

Algorithm Change Protocols in the Regulation of Adaptive Machine Learning–Based Medical Devices

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(10):e30545

DOI: 10.2196/30545

PMID: 34697010

PMCID: 8579211

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

How to ensure safety of a moving target: an industry perspective on algorithm change protocols for learning medical AI Algorithms

  • Stephen Gilbert; 
  • Matthew Fenech; 
  • Martin Hirsch; 
  • Shubhanan Upadhyay; 
  • Andrea Biasiucci; 
  • Johannes Starlinger

ABSTRACT

One of the greatest strengths of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) approaches in healthcare is that their performance can be continually improved based on updates from automated learning from data. However, healthcare AI/ML models are currently essentially regulated under provisions that were developed for an earlier age of slowly updated medical devices - requiring major documentation reshape and re-validation with every major update of the model generated by the ML algorithm. This creates minor problems for models that will be re-trained and updated only occasionally, but major problems for models that will learn from data in real-time or near real-time. Regulators have announced action plans for fundamental changes in regulatory approaches. Here, we examine the current regulatory frameworks and the developments in this domain. The status quo and recent developments are reviewed, and we argue that these innovative approaches to healthcare need these matching innovative approaches to regulation and that these approaches will bring benefits for patients. International perspectives from the WHO, and the FDA’s proposed approach, based around oversight of tool developers’ quality management systems and defined algorithm change protocols, offer a much-needed paradigm shift, and strive for a balanced approach to enabling rapid improvements in healthcare through AI innovation, whilst simultaneously ensuring patient safety. The draft EU regulatory framework indicates similar approaches, but no detail has yet been provided on how algorithm change protocols will be implemented in the EU, and this is required for the full benefits of AI/ML-based innovation for patients and for EU healthcare systems to be realised.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Gilbert S, Fenech M, Hirsch M, Upadhyay S, Biasiucci A, Starlinger J

Algorithm Change Protocols in the Regulation of Adaptive Machine Learning–Based Medical Devices

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(10):e30545

DOI: 10.2196/30545

PMID: 34697010

PMCID: 8579211

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.