Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Dermatology
Date Submitted: May 18, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: May 18, 2021 - Jul 13, 2021
Date Accepted: Jul 6, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 26, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Analysis of Teledermatology Consults in a County Hospital Setting
ABSTRACT
Background:
Teledermatology consults are increasingly used by primary care providers for diagnosis and triage of skin conditions. However, there are few studies that analyze which conditions are most commonly sent for teledermatology consultation and which of those are most often referred for an in-person visit.
Objective:
We aim to examine teledermatology consults sent from primary care providers at a county hospital to identify common diagnoses that prompted use of the teledermatology system and determine which diagnoses required an in-person visit after teledermatology evaluation.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was conducted based on 450 teledermatology consults from primary care providers at a county health system. Chart review was performed to identify the diagnoses made by the teledermatologist for each consult and which diagnoses prompted an in-person visit after teledermatology evaluation.
Results:
Our analysis captured 471 diagnoses. Seborrheic keratosis was the most frequent diagnosis (10.2%) prompting teledermatology consultation. Some diagnoses, such as non-melanoma skin cancer, actinic keratosis, and alopecia areata required an in-person visit after each teledermatology consult. Others, such as atopic dermatitis and lentigo, did not require an in-person visit and were able to be managed by teledermatology each time. Overall, 39.9% of diagnoses seen via teledermatology were referred for an in-person visit.
Conclusions:
Teledermatology is valuable in managing many dermatologic conditions that present to primary care, while serving as an effective triage tool for more complex conditions or concern for malignancy. Conditions that required procedural management or involved the scalp also frequently required an in-person referral after TD evaluation. The lowest proportion of referrals for an in-person visit occurred in banal conditions without concern for malignancy.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.