JMIR Publications

ABSTRACT

Background:

Virtual care delivery within mental health has increased rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding facilitators and challenges to adoption and perceptions of the quality of virtual care when delivered at scale can inform service planning post-pandemic and alignment with Quadruple Aim objectives.

Objective:

We sought to understand consistent facilitators and persistent challenges to adoption of virtual care and perceived impact on quality of care, in an initial pilot phase prior to the pandemic and then during scaled use during the pandemic in the mental health department of an ambulatory care hospital.

Methods:

This study took place at Women’s College Hospital, an academic ambulatory hospital located in Toronto, Canada. We utilized a multi-methods approach to collect quantitative data through aggregate utilization data of phone, video and in-person visits prior to and during COVID-19 lockdown measures, and through a provider experience survey administered to mental health providers (n=30). Qualitative data was collected through open-ended questions on provider experience surveys, focus groups (n=4) with mental health providers, and interviews with clinical administrative and implementation hospital staff (n=3).

Results:

Utilization data demonstrated the slower uptake of video visits at launch and prior to COVID-19 lockdown measures in Ontario (pre-March 2020), and subsequent increased uptake of phone and video visits during COVID-19 lockdown measures (post-March 2020). Mental health providers and clinic staff highlighted barriers and facilitators to adoption of virtual care at the operational, behavioural, cultural and system/policy levels such as required changes in workflows and scheduling, increased provider effort, provider and staff acceptance, and billing codes for physician providers. Much of the described provider experiences focused on perceived impact on quality of mental health care delivery, including perceptions on providing appropriate and patient-centered care, virtual care effectiveness, and equitable access to care for patients.

Conclusions:

Continued efforts to enhance suggested facilitators, reduce persistent challenges, and address provider concerns about care quality based on these findings can enable a hybrid model of patient-centered and appropriate care to emerge in the future, with options for in-person, video and phone visits being used to meet patient and clinical needs as required.