Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: May 6, 2021
Date Accepted: Feb 5, 2022
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
The Box: Cost-utility of an eHealth intervention in the outpatient clinic follow-up of acute myocardial infarction patients.
ABSTRACT
Background:
Smartphone compatible wearables have been released on the consumers market, enabling remote monitoring. Remote monitoring is often named as a tool to reduce cost of care.
Objective:
The primary purpose of this paper is to describe a cost-utility analysis of an eHealth intervention compared to regular follow-up in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Methods:
In this trial, patients with an AMI were randomized in a 1:1 fashion between an eHealth intervention and regular follow-up. The remote monitoring intervention consisted of a blood pressure monitor, weight scale, electrocardiogram (ECG) device and step counter. Furthermore, two in-office outpatient clinic visits were replaced by e-visits. The control group received regular care. The differences in mean costs and quality of life per patient between both groups during one year follow-up were calculated
Results:
Mean costs per patient were €2412 for the intervention, and €2888 for the control group. This yielded cost reduction of €475 per patient. This difference was not statistically significant (95% CI -€271;€1221; P=.212). The average quality adjusted life years (QALY) in the first year of follow was 0.74 for the intervention group and 0.69 for the control (difference -0.05, 95% CI -0.09;-0.01; P=.028).
Conclusions:
eHealth in the outpatient clinic setting in patients who suffered from acute myocardial infarction is very likely to be cost-effective compared to regular follow-up. Further research should be done to corroborate these findings in other patient populations and different care settings. Clinical Trial: NCT02976376
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.