Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: May 5, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: May 5, 2021 - May 12, 2021
Date Accepted: Jul 5, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 12, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Exploring Changes to the Actionability of COVID-19 Dashboards Over the Course of 2020: Descriptive Assessment and Expert Appraisal in the Canadian Context
ABSTRACT
Background:
Public, web-based COVID-19 dashboards are in use worldwide to communicate pandemic-related information. A global assessment during the early stages of the pandemic on the actionability of COVID-19 dashboards—as a predictor of their potential use for decision-making—revealed features conducive to their actionability were predominately absent. Given the unprecedented speed with which the dashboards were launched and their inherently dynamic nature, the evolution of COVID-19 dashboards with time merits exploration.
Objective:
To explore changes to COVID-19 dashboards in the Canadian context over the course of 2020, assessing how the dashboards developed and if the presence of actionability features changed over time.
Methods:
We conducted a descriptive assessment and expert appraisal with a panel of scorers (n=8) on a pan-Canadian sample of COVID-19 dashboards (n=26). Scorers assessed the dashboards at two points, in July and November 2020, using an assessment tool informed by communication theory and health care performance intelligence. Using Nominal Group Technique, scorers organized in panels of three, appraised the presence of the seven features of highly actionable dashboards at both time points.
Results:
Improvements were made to the dashboards over time, predominately related to data (specificity of geographic break downs, range of reported indicators, explanations of data sources/calculations) and advancements enabled by the technology used (customization of time trends, interactive/visual chart elements). Similarly, improvements to the presence of actionability features were most pronounced for providing data locally, reporting of time trends, and indicator management. No improvements on communicative elements (clarity of purpose and audience) were found. The use of story-telling techniques to narrate trends also remained largely absent from the dashboards.
Conclusions:
Improvements to COVID-19 dashboards in the Canadian context over the course of 2020 were mostly driven by advancements that appear related to data availability and dashboard technology. Further increasing the actionability of dashboards for use during public health crises calls for increased attention to both technical and organisational aspects of development processes, including better skill-mixing across disciplines, continued investment in data standards and clearer mandates of their developers for accountability and purpose-driven dashboards.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.