Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: May 1, 2021
Date Accepted: Sep 14, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Availability and Suitability of Digital Health Tools in Africa for Pandemic Control: Scoping Review and Cluster Analysis

Silenou BC, Nyirenda JL, Zaghloul A, Lange B, Doerrbecker J, Schenkel K, Krause G

Availability and Suitability of Digital Health Tools in Africa for Pandemic Control: Scoping Review and Cluster Analysis

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2021;7(12):e30106

DOI: 10.2196/30106

PMID: 34941551

PMCID: 8738990

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Large number of digital health tools available in Africa - few suitable for pandemic control: Cluster analysis of systematic review and survey

  • Bernard C. Silenou; 
  • John L.Z. Nyirenda; 
  • Ahmed Zaghloul; 
  • Berit Lange; 
  • Juliane Doerrbecker; 
  • Karl Schenkel; 
  • Gérard Krause

ABSTRACT

Background:

Gaining oversight over the rapidly growing number of mobile health (mHealth) tools for surveillance or outbreak management in Africa has become a challenge.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to map the functional portfolio of mHealth tools used for surveillance or outbreak management of communicable diseases in Africa.

Methods:

We conducted a scoping review by combining data from a systematic review of the literature and a telephone survey of experts. We applied the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines by searching for articles published between January 2010 and December 2020. We additionally used the respondent-driven sampling method and conducted a telephone survey among representatives from national public health institutes in all African countries. We combined the findings and used hierarchical clustering method to group the tools based on their functionalities (attributes).

Results:

We identified 30 tools out of 1914 publications and 45 responses from 28 (52%) out of 54 African countries. Four (13%: SORMAS, Go.Data, CommCare, and DHIS2) out of 30 tools covered 14 (93%) out of 15 identified attributes. Seventeen (59%) tools manage health events data, 20 (67%) manage case-based data and 28 (97%) offer a dashboard. Clustering identified 2 exceptional attributes for outbreak management, namely “contact follow-up” (offered by 8 tools), and “transmission network visualization” (offered by SORMAS and Go.Data).

Conclusions:

There is a large range of tools in use, yet the majority of them does not offer a comprehensive set of attributes, resulting in the need for public health workers having to use multiple tools in parallel. Only four tools cover the majority of the attributes, including those most relevant for the response to the COVID-19 pandemic such as laboratory interface, contact follow-up and transmission network visualization.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Silenou BC, Nyirenda JL, Zaghloul A, Lange B, Doerrbecker J, Schenkel K, Krause G

Availability and Suitability of Digital Health Tools in Africa for Pandemic Control: Scoping Review and Cluster Analysis

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2021;7(12):e30106

DOI: 10.2196/30106

PMID: 34941551

PMCID: 8738990

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.