Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: May 3, 2021
Date Accepted: Dec 20, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Computerized Psychological Interventions in Veterans and Service Members: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Pearson R, Carl E, Creech SK

Computerized Psychological Interventions in Veterans and Service Members: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(6):e30065

DOI: 10.2196/30065

PMID: 35657663

PMCID: 9206197

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Computerized psychological interventions in veterans and service members: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

  • Rahel Pearson; 
  • Emily Carl; 
  • Suzannah K. Creech

ABSTRACT

Background:

Computerized psychological interventions (CPIs) can overcome logistical and psychosocial barri-ers to utilization of mental health care in veterans affairs (VA) and department of defense (DoD) settings.

Objective:

In this systematic review we outline the existing literature, with the goal of describing: 1) the scope and quality of the available literature, 2) intervention characteristics, study methods and outcomes, and 3) study limitations and potential directions for future research.

Methods:

Systematic searches of two databases (PsychINFO and PubMed,) were conducted from inception until November 15, 2020. The following inclusion criteria were used 1) the study was published in an English-language peer-reviewed journal, 2) participants were randomly allocated to a CPI or a control group (non-CPI active treatment or non-active control group), 3) an intervention in at least one treatment arm was primarily delivered through the computer/internet with or without additional support, 4) participants were veterans or service members, and 5) the study used validated measures to examine the effect of treatment on psychological outcomes.

Results:

The review included 23 studies which met pre-defined inclusion criteria. The majority of studies were at high risk for bias. Targeted outcomes, participant characteristics, type of support delivered, adherence and participant satisfaction are described. Most examined interventions (19 out of 24) yielded positive results. Study limitations include participant characteristics limiting study infer-ence, high rates of attrition and an over-reliance on self-reported outcomes.

Conclusions:

Relatively few high-quality studies were identified, and more rigorous investigations are needed. Several recommendations for future research are discussed, including adopting methods that mini-mize attrition, optimize usage and allow for personalization of treatment.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Pearson R, Carl E, Creech SK

Computerized Psychological Interventions in Veterans and Service Members: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(6):e30065

DOI: 10.2196/30065

PMID: 35657663

PMCID: 9206197

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.