Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 24, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 23, 2021 - Jun 18, 2021
Date Accepted: Aug 12, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Accuracy and Diversity of Wearable Device–Based Gait Speed Measurement Among Older Men: Observational Study

Kang MG, Kang SJ, Roh HK, Jung HY, Kim S, Choi JY, Pharmacy SNUBHCT

Accuracy and Diversity of Wearable Device–Based Gait Speed Measurement Among Older Men: Observational Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(10):e29884

DOI: 10.2196/29884

PMID: 34633293

PMCID: 8546531

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Accuracy and diversity of wearable device-based gait speed measurement among older adults: Observational study

  • Min-Gu Kang; 
  • Seong-Ji Kang; 
  • Hye-Kang Roh; 
  • Hwa-Young Jung; 
  • Sun‑wook Kim; 
  • Jung-Yeon Choi; 
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Clinical Trials Pharmacy

ABSTRACT

Gait speed measurement is used widely as a slow gait is a major feature of frailty and a diagnostic criterion for sarcopenia. With the development of wearable devices, it is possible to obtain daily life gait speed simply by wearing the device. Therefore, it is feasible and worthwhile to accurately determine the characteristics of daily-life gait speed and analyze their association with sarcopenia. We invited community-dwelling men over 50 years of age who had visited outpatient clinic at a tertiary university hospital. Daily life gait speed was assessed using a smart belt (WELT) the participants wore for a period of 4 weeks. Data from participants who wore the smart belt for at least 10 days during this period were included. After 4 weeks, data from a survey about medical and social history, “usual gait speed” measurements, handgrip strength measurements, and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry were analyzed. A total of 217,578 daily life gait speed data from 106 participants (mean age, 71.1 ± 7.6 years) were analyzed. The mean daily life gait speed was 1.23 ± 0.26 m/s. The daily life gait speed of the participants varied by time and day of the week. Daily life gait speed was significantly lower in older individuals (P<0.001). Participants with sarcopenia (1.12 ± 0.11 m/s) had significantly lower mean daily life gait speed than participants who did not have sarcopenia (1.23 ± 0.08 m/s; P<0.001). Analysis of factors related to mean daily life gait speed showed that age and skeletal muscle mass of the lower limbs were significantly associated characteristics. In conclusion, more diverse and accurate information about gait speed can be obtained by measuring daily life gait speed using a wearable device over an appropriate time period, compared to one-time measurements performed in a laboratory setting. Importantly, daily life gait speed is significantly associated with skeletal muscle mass of the lower limbs, in addition to age.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kang MG, Kang SJ, Roh HK, Jung HY, Kim S, Choi JY, Pharmacy SNUBHCT

Accuracy and Diversity of Wearable Device–Based Gait Speed Measurement Among Older Men: Observational Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(10):e29884

DOI: 10.2196/29884

PMID: 34633293

PMCID: 8546531

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.