Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics
Date Submitted: Jul 2, 2021
Date Accepted: Dec 4, 2021
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Machine Learning for Cardiovascular Outcomes from Wearable Data: a Systematic Review from a Technology Readiness Level Point of View
ABSTRACT
Background:
Wearable technology has the potential to improve cardiovascular health monitoring using machine learning. It enables remote health monitoring and allows for diagnosis and prevention. In addition to detection of cardiovascular disease, it can exclude a diagnosis in symptomatic patients, preventing unnecessary hospital visits. Furthermore, early warning systems can aid the cardiologist in timely treatment and prevention.
Objective:
We systematically assessed literature on detecting and predicting outcomes of cardiovascular disease with data obtained from wearables to gain insights in the current challenges and limitations.
Methods:
We searched PubMed, Scopus and IEEE Xplore on September 26, 2020 with no restrictions on the publication date using keywords: wearables, machine learning and cardiovascular disease. Methodologies were categorized and analyzed according to machine learning based technology readiness levels (TRLs) that score studies on their potential to be deployed in an operational setting from 1 to 9 (most ready).
Results:
After removal of duplicates, applying exclusion criteria, and full-text screening, 55 eligible studies remained for analysis, covering a variety of cardiovascular diseases. None of the studies were integrated into a health care system (TRL < 6), prospectively phase 2 and 3 trials were absent (TRL < 7 and 8) and group cross-validation was rarely used, limiting to demonstrate their effectiveness. Furthermore, there seems to be no agreement on the sample size needed to train these models, the size of the observation window used to make predictions, how long subjects should be observed and the type of machine learning model that is suitable for predicting cardiovascular outcomes.
Conclusions:
Although current studies show the potential of wearables to monitor cardiovascular events, their deployment as a diagnostic and/or prognostic cardiovascular clinical tool is hampered by the lack of using a realistic dataset and a proper systematic and prospective evaluation.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.